Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
> Where are the experimentally based technical points that will convince > Jones to change his opinions? > The papers by Miles might convince him, but evidently he has not read them. I say that because he keeps making assertions that contradict those papers. A person cannot be convinced by papers he has not read. If the papers by Miles do not convince him then I would say the discussion is closed. We have to agree to disagree. I have no other evidence to present. His most recent argument falls outside the bounds of conventional debate. I find it impossible to parse. It is: "The IMRA laboratory may have had a good opportunity to study helium, or they may not have. They may or may not have done a study. So that proves Miles is wrong." Two unknowns magically prove an assertion they have no connection to. Even if you knew the truth value of both (which we do not) it would tell you nothing about the conclusion. I guess that is New Age reasoning. - Jed
