> On Oct 3, 2014, at 7:28, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Isn't that the same as fully ionized H?
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Fartphone
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Eric Walker" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Vo]:Rossi Report will come, old paradigm will depart
> Date: Thu, Oct 2, 2014 11:49 PM
>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I predict a CoP of 2.6 and that the reactor accumulates a high
>> positive charge even to the point of occasionally arcing to it's
>> frame. (Actually, the arc path is from the frame to the reactor.)
>
> Just curious -- why the accumulation of positive charge?
>
> Eric
>
