A micro particle size of 5 microns is the resonate size for optimum dipole vibrations for a temperature of 600C.
Dipole motion is the power source that drives the nano sized field emitters on the surface of these nickel micro particles. These field emitters are best shapes as parabolas or alternately as sharp lines as per Piantelli's surface design. DGT supports their particles using a nickel foam. Suspending and spacing the micro particles throughout the volume of a nickel foam is a way to separate the particles to avoid nickel to copper transmutation. DGT only fuses hydrogen to light elements like boron, lithium and beryllium in the hydrogen envelope within the nickel foam. On the other hand, Rossi packs his powder tight which will cause nickel to copper transmutation. The nickel foam also provides a positively charged backplane during dipole vibration that enables the formation of a Bose Einstein condensate at the tips of the nano field emitter network on the surface of the nickel micro-powder particles. On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > I use carbonyl Ni, the same as Rossi and Defkalion. Rossi adds his own > treatment which he claims is cheap. Neither use nano-Ni. Will my > treatment of this Ni work? Only time will tell. Results with the QSI > nano-Ni have been disappointing. Also, nano-Ni is not durable - I.E, it > will easily sinter into larger particles at high temperature (600C). If > nano-Ni was found to be required, it will be painful to make something work > at high temperature for long periods. Nano-Ni might be OK for hand warmers. > > Bob Higgins > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* Bob Higgins >> >> >> >> Sorry about your caffeine deficit, but 10g of Ni doesn't cost more than a >> barrel of oil. A kilogram of Ni powder I use was sent to me as a sample. >> No one would sample 100 barrels of oil. Ni is cheap. >> >> >> >> But did your sample work? >> >> >> >> J Not being intentionally glib, but the nickel Rossi uses is somehow >> special and possibly costly – who knows? >> >> >> >> The QSI nickel nanopowder which gave a small amount of gain in the Ahern >> experiments costs about $20/gram as I remember. The Arata nickel powders >> are even pricier since they are spin cast. >> >> >> >> But yes – I agree that once the best powder is found - the volume price >> will come down with mass production. >> >> >> >> The disappointment for many will be that the Rossi effect, if it is >> limited to the one isotope - may not be the slam-dunk solution to the >> energy crisis which we all hoped that it would be. >> >> >> >> >> >> IOW 10 grams of nickel would give the equivalent heat of about a barrel of >> oil. >> >> That makes the bottom line problematic, since 10 grams of nickel powder >> will >> cost more than a barrel of oil… assuming this is accurate. (operating on a >> caffeine deficit) >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> >> > >
