In the ash sample from this test each particle is very different in many
ways. You cannot do that particle by particle customization commensally.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:42 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:

> According to Pomp you can fake the ash with commercially available samples.
> Now perhaps Pomp's claim is an exaggeration and it is only possible to
> roughly approximate the ash.
> I'll let the experts decide.
>
>
> Harry
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Can you get Ni62 at 90% enragement from a commercial source? Why not just
>> add some copper to the ash, it is cheaper to create that fraud.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:21 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You have some unfounded assumptions in your thinking that are the same
>>>> assumption that the testers suffer from.
>>>>
>>>> The reaction does not center on the nickel or the lithium. The LENR
>>>> transmutation is done in the hydrogen and the aluminum and other elements.
>>>>
>>>> Did you see this line on page 53?
>>>>
>>>> Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a
>>>> very fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the
>>>> fuel also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and
>>>> these are not found in the ash.
>>>>
>>>> This means that C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn were consumed in the LENR
>>>> reaction.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> ​Unfortunately, it is also consistent with the fraud theory that the ash
>>> came from a commercial source.​
>>>
>>>
>>> ​Harry​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to