Wait a minute, is everyone suggesting that all the ash was NI62. Where is that coming from?
Only 10% of the ash was even sent as a sample for testing and then I think only certain particles of the ash were tested for isotopic composition. Other than to say that some of the nickel was in a different isotopic concentration from the fuel (and natural isotopic concentration) I don't think the report is suggesting anything else. > P29: > > By the researchers calculations there are 3MWh released from transmutation > of Li7, and Ni isotopes, and supposedly all of the other initial chemicals > transmuted into Ni too as not present in Ash (which would release huge, > though unquantified amounts of binding energy), yet only 1.5MWh output > recorded, and calorimetry which is supposed to be accurate to ~10%. > > more magic involved? fusion + fission transmutations that release copious > neutrinos with no gammas, betas, neutrons or alphas? > > It's starting to smell. > > On 9 October 2014 11:52, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I may have missed the paragraph that stated the amount of material that >> was taken from within the reactor as ash. Did they recover >> approximately >> the same amount as was put in? >> >> Also, I do not recall how much of the ash by weight was nickel and >> lithium. Perhaps I need to read the report again to look for these >> details. Does anyone know whether or not the isotropic shifted >> metals actually added up to the total amount of nickel, etc. at the >> beginning? I would not be surprised to find that some of the metals >> from >> the fuel found their way to being attached to the body of the reactor >> due >> to the extreme temperatures. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, Oct 8, 2014 10:51 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in >> >> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> I can't imagine how, but perhaps what was left behind inside the >>> reactor >>> when added to the ash would show that no isotopic shifts took place. >>> >> >> Sorry, but that makes no sense. The material that came out proves there >> are isotopic shifts. What stayed behind cannot "unprove" that. What did >> you >> have in mind? That the other isotopes all got left behind? That would be >> an >> isotope separation technology of a totally unexpected and inexplicable >> new >> type. It would be as miraculous as transmutation. >> >> Also, if you "cannot imagine how" then your assertion has no place in a >> serious scientific discussion. You have to imagine how, and other people >> have to agree that what you imagine is plausible. This is not a fantasy >> role playing game, where you can invoke dragons or miracles. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
