Inventor is unsociable:
> Brady has left a sour taste with at least some investors and suppliers. His
> lack of simple courtesy towards some of them have resulted in angry rants . . .
Actual tests have not been performed by the person reporting: > prove valid. But, without actual tests of a machine in a lab there can be > no assurance that is the case.
Inventor invites US government experts, and no one else. > He apparently has offered to allow a government lab in the U.S. to test a > unit.
What is it about the US government that attracts these people? The feds would be the last people on my list.
Inventor repeatedly promises to show the device but he always reneges. > However, his promises of demonstrations in this country in the past > have never been fulfilled.
Inventor has been at it for decades, but strangely enough he never has an actual working device left around. (You can say this about many CF researchers, I will grant).
> He claims to have begun trying to build a self-powered motor about 30 years
> ago.
At some point, "a scientist" undercut his effort and discouraged investors. > An investor had a scientist friend who convinced him it must be fraud.
There was a dramatic, convincing demonstration, often at the trial. > Brady claims he brought a working motor into the courtroom and two > scientists brought in by the court could find no evidence of fraud.
Why would the inventor wait until the trial is in session?!? If the gadget works he could have resolved the issue months before that at no expense.
The inventor is a naive, sui generis genius, who has no theory.
He is trying to "market" the device, yet it never occurs to him that if it works as claimed he could sell millions of them in a few months (as "toys").
> He makes no claims
> as to theory, but simply kept experimenting until he felt he had a motor
> ready for the market.
The inventor is reportedly smart but the people who say that have not actually viewed a working machine.
> One of our investors took his EE Ph.D. in S. Africa, and two EEs who are
> friends of his, both specializing in power, know Brady from some years back
> when they worked together. They have stated he is a good engineer. To
> date, they apparently have not viewed a working motor, although they may do
> so at some point in the future.
The machine is NEVER actually available in one piece! > When they first visited Brady the motor > was in a disassembled state.
Production is imminent. > He claims production in Germany will begin in perhaps 30 days . . .
The mass media has been invited. > , and that > German TV has been invited to film the story.
The truth is out there and it will emerge. > Whatever the truth of the > matter -- it may emerge in the not too distant future.
Of course none of this proves that Brady is a fake. But some of it is a warning flag -- especially the part about promising to demonstrate machines and then reneging. Also, the improbable nonsense, such as waiting until a trial before demonstrating the system, sounds like an urban myth to me.
It is depressing and boring to hear the same story over and over again.
- Jed
