Hi Robin. Cagles theory seems to fail in the case of static charges?
For if lambda=h/mv, and v=0, lambda = infinity for a static charge. So then, all like static charges would attract by Cagles general case #1. Am I misunderstanding something here? K. -----Original Message----- From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 6:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Geometry of the Casimir Effect In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 25 Aug 2004 06:50:42 -0700: Hi, [snip] > Short-Range Electron Attractive Force > > by Ken Shoulders > >Statement of Action: > >There is an attractive force found between closely spaced, free electrons instead of >the universally touted repulsion force. This attractive force is effective only at dimensions in the order of atomic spacing, being in the range of 10-10 meters, leaving older repulsion laws intact for large spacing. When this force binds two or more electrons, their expressed field at a distance is reduced. This is a newfound property of this otherwise well-known particle. Ref: " Explosive Electron Emission" by G. A. Mesyats, ISBN-7691-0881-5, 1998, URO-PRESS, Yekateringburg. This sounds an awful lot like Charles Cagle's theory that the electric force between two charged particles is reversed when the De Broglie wavelength in the CM frame exceeds the separation distance. (see http://www.singtech.com/definitions.html#anchor587207 ). Regards, Robin van Spaandonk The only protection from terrorism is friendship.
