In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 16 Sep 2004 04:49:19 -0800: Hi, [snip] >At 2:22 PM 9/16/4, Robin van Spaandonk wrote: >>In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:56:02 -0800: >>Hi, >> >>I interpreted the use of the word WEAK to be related to the fact that the >>effect reported on was only about a 1% change, not to the fact that the >>weak force was involved. > >That clearly is the case for the second "WEAK" used by Takahashi (requted >below), but not the first.
Agreed. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk Check out http://www.betavote.com/
