[Revision of Previous Post]
Fred Sparber has proposed a new elementary particle, *Electronium* for which he will
win the Nobel prize if he is proven correct.
Pause...silence... a few coughs and chuckles... but yes, you looked back didn't you,
and found that I didn't add a 'smiley' there - because this is a serious hypothetical
proposal, albeit with little direct proof thus far. It is too green to present in a
more formal manner yet, but it is such a fundamentally important insight that even
though it is appearing on a forum that the mainstream establishment may consider to be
a backwater news group (vortex) it is of absolutely overwhelming potential importance
to all of science... IF correct, of course.... so it deserves to be aired prematurely.
Plus, the concept is elegant in that it explains almost *all* OU or "excess heat"
experiments, at least those experiments not involving fusion or EVOs (Shoulder's bound
electrons). It also explains deuterium 'stripping' which is a nuclear reaction. It
also explains R. Mills unusual findings of EUV light (extreme ultraviolet) and excess
heat - better than Mills own theory, some might agree. Plus, it is easily disprovable,
which Mills theory is not. It might also explain some energy anomalies involving
magnetics and ferrites.
If... in the coming months, one should see a flurry of articles appearing in
mainstream journals or newsgroups, advocating or announcing the same particle under a
different name but without proper attribution, please be sure to direct the claimants'
attention to vortex. last day of August.
OTOH, perhaps something obvious has been missed... perhaps someone today will suggest
a good reason why this could not happen. Focused experiments to disprove electronium
will take longer to perform, but are in the planning stages. That is the nature of
hypothesis and the scientific method - now enhanced by the ultrafast information
sharing capability of the internet. Time will tell, and to speed that up - throw it
out on the WWW, ASAP.
ELECTRONIUM
This charged particle has two electrons bound with one positron into a stable
particle. Like proton and neutron formation, some of the original mass has been
converted into binding energy. Consider it as a heavy electron, but just light enough
to have escaped detection heretofore (except possibly by R. Mills who has concocted a
thoroughly bizarre, but at first glance brilliant theory of nearly a thousand pages to
explain what I will try to summarize in one page - all Mills results can be attributed
to a new rare but stable fundamental particle but without his faulty mathematics
(yet).
BTW, you may even see some evidence of electronium in older oscilloscopes, if you have
ever wonder why you can't get a tight dot. or given the electrostatic deflection of
electron beams in a CRT since the charge is constant and mass might vary from 2 to
2.8 times 9.1e-31 the regular electrons will have
a deflection of (2 )^1/2 to (2.8)^1/2 times that of the heavier species, if by chance
they might be in a standard scope in concentrations of parts per billion which might
occur normally inolder scopes. IOW, f one sets the e-beam spot off the side of the
tube and turns up the intensity it might be possible to see a weak spot from the
heavier species.
Hypothetical Properties:
Spin 1/2,
Net Charge minus 1.6e-19 Coulombs
Mass 2* Me = 1.82e-30 kg,
Radius 4.235E-15 meters
1st proton orbit (27.2 ev) radius 2.645e-11 meters
Velocity 2.186e6 meters/sec (c*alpha)
2nd proton orbit (108.8 ev) radius 1.322e-11 meters
Velocity 4.373e6 meters/sec 2 (c*alpha)
3rd proton orbit (244.8 ev) radius 8.816e-12 meters
Velocity 6.558e6 meters/sec 3 (c*alpha)
These perticles should be created massively in the sun whenever 1.02 Mev photons
create positron-electron pairs and they combine with an electron under enormous
pressure. The so-called electron in the primary reaction:
P-e-P ----> D + neutrino
will most likely be electronium in the stellar environment. So without it, deuterium
might not form as readily. Electronium will also decay rapidly in a stellar
environment, as its binding energy is in the hundred keV range; consequently, the only
electronium which escapes gets accelerated away quickly to an environment where there
high binding energy can keep it stable for extended periods.
Over the millennia, these rare but stable (on earth) particles will tend to accumulate
in less hostile environments, so that after a few billion years of continuous
production, a substantial number - in the PPM range or even tens per million might
possibly be evidenced in certain elements with negative electron affinity: i.e.
electronium would replace one of the electrons in such atmospheric elements as oxygen,
or perhaps even nitrogen; electronium would also accumulate in the electron clouds of
the alkalai metals, such as potassiun and strontium. That is why Mills may incorrectly
be calling these hydrino catalysts: they do indeed stimulate a shrunken hydrogen, but
the shrinkage is caused by the transfer of electronium from the alkalai host to a
lower electron orbital on hydrogen where 27.2 eV, 108.8 eV and 244.8 eV.
Eventually over time these electronium heavy electrons would work their way into water
where they might appear with the same or greater frequency as deuterium, and supply
some of the excess energy in water, when it is found experimentally such as by
Graneau, Griggs etc, It should be noted that these are experiments which depend on the
"Type" of water (natural enrichemnt ?) Electronium is probably concentrated in the
same way that deuterium is concentrated, so that some of the excess heat of LENR could
be coming from electronium.
Electronium formation ab initio:
-------> -q
<------- + q
--------> - q net charge - q Net Spin 1/2
3 times 0.511Mev - .511 Mev = 1.02 Mev (1.632e-13 joule) rest mass divided between
the three disks gives about 0.340 Mev mass per disk. Hence a mass of 1.632e-19/c^2 =
1.82e-30 kg
A positron is stable; it won't decay. When a positron finds an electron (after
slowing down), they end up orbiting each other as positronium (Ps) for a while before
they annihilate in our three space. In other words, Ps is not stable in our three
space, but neither or eta-quarks... from which ALL matter is made... yet both quarks
and Ps are both quite stable when bound in triplicate (according to this hypothesis).
It is true that under normal circumstances, a positronium is electrically neutral and
would have no interest in bringing another electron in to make a threesome. That is
why these would be formed in cosmic, or stellar events, esp the supernova. The
positronium will be prohibited from annihilation by the high energy fields or high
gravitational fields until a after it has formed the stable particle. These charged
particles would be rarity particles in stars, but stable over billions of years on
planets, as the binding energy is in the hundreds of keV.
Stay tuned or the next installment which will explore in more detail *how* this
particle explains most of the energy anomalies which are routinely explored on this
forum.
Jones
