At 3:53 AM 10/15/4, thomas malloy wrote:

>>  that have not attacked us.  iraq did
>>not attack us.
>
>Yah, what about the airplane that Saddam had in which they trained
>people to take over it with short bladed knives. Then there is the
>matter of Al Queda members being frequent quests in the country


Something that amazes me is the lack of recognition, even in the
presidential debates, of the fact that we have been in a shooting war with
Iraq since the gulf war.  In the year or so prior to the Iraq invasion
there were regular, sometimes daily, reports of Iraq shooting at US or
British planes, or us shooting back.  US and British pilots have been
flying missions in harms way over Iraq for over 10 years.  Iraq did not
live up to the agreement that ended Desert Storm.  It seems to me that was
plenty of reason to finish off the war.

The other thing that amazes me is the lack of recognition that if we wanted
to do maximum harm to Iraq, to extract maximum revenge, this would have
been most easily accomplished by immediately leaving the country after
having destroying Iraq's heavy weapons.  This would have left Iraq open to
civil war and invasion by Iran.  We also could have killed off Iraq's army
in the field instead of letting them walk home.  It seems no good deed goes
unpunished in Iraq.  The no-fly zones were created to protect Iraqis from
Sadam, that is to say Iraqis from Iraqis. Perhaps we should simply threaten
to pull out, or just pull out, and only protect the Kurds.

It was not long ago South Koreans wanted US troops out - over a traffic
mishap involving our troops.  Now they are upset over our planned troop
reductions.

We were concerned about Iraq getting nuclear weapons.  Many countries seem
to have interest in obtaining weapons of mass destruction.  It seems to me
these countries must not be aware of the consequences of what they are
doing.  If a country with a small nuclear arsonal uses one of them, they
have opened themselves up to unlimited war and complete annihilation.  This
kind of war the US can fight instantaneously with no additional manpower at
all.  It all makes no sense.  It seems the world is going collectively
insane.

Regards,

Horace Heffner          


Reply via email to