> [Original Message]
> From: Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: vortex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 10/17/04 8:58:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Scoping Electronium, (*e-)
>
> Frederick Sparber writes.
>
> > Also, electron bombardment of the Zinc "Salts" Phosphor
> and SiO2 glass, can shake out (*e-) as Auger electrons....
>
>
> ...or what about this relevant possibility (which might just
> appeal to a few of the "free-thinker" experimenters on
> vortex)...
>
> Everyone who follows CF has a theory about the missing 24
> MeV of energy which should be there in the form of a
> "signature" gamma when deuterium combines to form helium,
> but is notoriously absent... as Park and other skeptics of
> LENR will be quick to let you know.
>
Given that many radioisotopes Internally Create Electron-Positron Pairs,
I see no reason why the D-D to He4 reaction couldn't create a local plethora
of pairs that combine with the resident electrons, and end up as the (*e-)
particle, especially in the Pd-D lattice.
>
> Yes, there are other (feeble) theories to account for this
> lack or absence of the characteristic photon, of course, but
> none of them are at all convincing... so let's add one more
> ingredient into the (mental) boiling kettle for your
> consideration, and see which one eventually rises to the top
> ...
>
> This new one being that in the CF reaction zone, most of the
> energy released goes into (*e-) synthesis !!
>
Yes. Why not?
>
> We have hypothesized before that if the heavy electron (*e-)
> exists in the earth environment (and under one of the main
> tenets of string theory there is every reason to suspect
> that (*e-) must have existed at one time in the past), then
> some of it, or most of it, would have been created in
> energetic cosmological events, such as a supernova, perhaps
> the one from which our sun was born.
>
> I suspect that if one looks closely at the *effective*
> pressures and heat which are involved at the subangstrom
> focal point of helium formation in that brief picosecond
> before the D+D or "dirty deed" transpires within the tight
> confines of the Pd matrix, then perhaps something similar in
> the way of confinement parameters (to the supernova) may be
> occurring in an otherwise relatively cold matrix.
>
Note that the presemce of the Pd nucleous is also a facotor since
the pair production cross-section increases as Z^2:
http://www.sandia.gov/ASCI/russia/pdf_files/gryaznykh1998.pdf
>
> At any rate, the end product of D+D cold fusion could be...
> not just the alpha, which is now well-documented, but in
> addition, a dozen of so (*e-) particles, which after
> depositing their thermal energy, would take up residence in
> both the Pd and the He...
>
Why only a dozen? 24 Mev might create more than 20 (*e-) particles that can
get in the mix as catalysts for more CF reactions.
>
> But is this wild hypothesis disprovable... YES !
>
> ....if one can collect the He off of a running CF cell and
> run it through the most sensitive mass-spec, that procedure
> might be the easy way - and a method to find and document
> the elusive electronium, should it be the main product of
> the most typical CF reaction.
>
> I wonder what the sensitivity is of the very top of the line
> mass-spec? This article below seems to indicate that the
> leading edge of the test instrument art in common use for
> mass-energy measurement is "now 2-5 ppm, which many
> instruments achieve with an external calibration or lock
> mass..."
> http://www.lcgceurope.com/lcgceurope/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=88264
> It is not clear if that is for atomic mass or group mass,
> but perhaps it is indicative of an instrument being
> available.
>
> If the He from a CF cell were doubly enriched with
> electronium it would have roughly 2 MeV greater mass energy.
> compared to the normal 3.728 GeV or .00027 greater than
> normal, or 2700 ppm, no?
>
> ... which should be measurable, one would think... even
> without a top of the line instrument.
>
Possibly, but remember Pons and Fleischmann claim their experiment "blew a
14
inch diameter hole in the benchtop. :-)
>
Frederick
>
> Jones
>
