Ken Shoulder's highly speculative new ideas (even more so
than normal) will definitely attract the anti-gravity
(clock) watchers on vortex

and, excuse the specialized pun, the best thing about Ken's
ideas is ... no charge... ;-)

The pdf on  "Large-Scale Propulsion Using EVOs" can be
downloaded from:

http://www.svn.net/krscfs/


Side note: Here's a semi-obvious thing which you may never
have thought of in this way:

"Controllable propulsion is the functional equivalent of
antigravity in that it allows for the nullification of
gravitational effects near planetary objects and in space.
At the level of basic technology discussed here, there is a
strong affinity between the engineering aspects of
propulsion, antigravity and electrical energy production."

Now that does not necessarily mean that everthing which is
overunity (energy-wise) will also have antigravity side
effects ... but there is an interconnection by way of
"time." To blend in a little "Saviour" into the mix... why
would we ever assume that the time parameter must remain
constant?

Of course, many of us knew that this is probably how ET's
bicycle was able to achieve antigravity.... he merely
altered the time parameter.... "time flies" as they say...
seriously, though, almost any human can achieve anti-gravity
for a short period. Even without reading Buchanan's
"Ubiquity" you are no doubt fairly familiar with the ongoing
struggle against one "power law" which we have to contend
with on a regular basis - gravity.

The only thing two things keeping humans from achieving
sustained antigravity are consequently either controllable
propulsion or controllable time. Control of either will
suffice. An important feature of gravity revealed by all
this is the possible variability in time parameter. A heavy
object falling freely  near the surface of the earth
undergoes constant acceleration at almost ten m/sec/sec (32
ft/sec/sec)... or else it just feels time differently. At
the end of the first second, it would have fallen ~5 m (16
ft) and would have a speed of close to10 m/sec (32 ft/sec).
At the end of the second second (my spell checker can't
figure that one out), the object would have fallen ~20 m (64
ft) and after the third 256. So if you work back the other
way, you can see that any human can overcome gravity for
quite a few milliseconds, and if ... one could only control
time a little better...

If I were going to borrow something from ET in order to "go
places" in this world, if would be his "watch" instead of
the bicycle...

...and BTW "watch" Ken Shoulders. He may be plugging into
something which will electrify us all. I'm dying to know if
his EVO experiment has been performed on a precision scale
yet. In fact. I was a little disappointed that these results
were not what this new document was about when I first read
the title.

Anyway, I will predict that we will hear something on that
front soon, whether it be more levity or real
anti-gravity...

Jones



Reply via email to