Hi George,

> Is it possible that you are confusing antiferromagnetic,
which
> is a ferromagnetic material where the electron spins in
alternating
> layers of atoms are in opposite directions with magnetic
shielding
> such as is provided by superconductors.

Yes. My terminology is confusing and non-standard. What I am
referring to is antiferromagnetic spin reorientation and the
exchange-bias effect where a (virtual ?) antiferromagnetic
layer (which can be superconducting or not but is not
ferromagnetic, so I guess it would be called "virtual") can
either expel the flux of a nearby ferromagnet or else, on
paramagnetic transition, partially align with it. A true
antiferromagnetic effect would be more robust, of course,
but is it even possible, and if so how easily switched?

BTW... care to share or report on any of  your recent
efforts at this flux gate approach to OU ?

Jones


Reply via email to