At 10:37 am 20-10-04 +0000, you wrote: >At 05:49 pm 19-10-04 -0500, grimer wrote:
<snip> >Some years ago I had a desultory correspondence with >Dr Paul Rowe who was convinced he had evidence that >electric discharges in a vacuum could generate hydrogen. >Perhaps his stuff is on the web somewhere. Let's see. >Google "paul rowe" - 3100 hits. Mmm...Paul Rowe baritone?.. >Paul Rowe is obviously a common name. >Let's add hydrogen - 213 hits - that's more like it. > >Fancy that now! Right at the top of the page. > > ====================================== > HYDROGEN FROM THE VACUUM? and More.... > by Dr. Paul Rowe > Infinite Energy Magazine page 79 > Issue 17 Dec 1997 - Jan 1998 > ====================================== <snip> Further googling - "Paul Rowe" hydrogen - turned up the following. =============================================================== INE'99 SYMPOSIUM FOR NEW ENERGY AUGUST 27 & 28, 1999, SLC, UTAH 11:30 Paul Rowe's Paper - "The Rowe Effect and Transmutation" ABSTRACT: Hal Fox published a paper of mine which attempted to demonstrate that hydrogen gas has been produced in and from vacuum. It included direct quotes from many highly respected experimenters, along with results of my own experiments. Hal named the transformation of vacuum into hydrogen: "the Rowe Effect". In subsequent papers 2-3-4, I have proposed that vacuum is not a void but a rather a highly concentrated matrix of protons and electrons and suggested that the matrix might be Bose-Einstein condensed hydrogen.In this speech, I will attempt to show that presence of such a matrix is not as unlikely as it seems and that neutrons produced in or from such a matrix might cause transmutation while avoiding the Coulomb barrier. In the process, I will discuss physical phenomena that many scientists have forgotten that they can't explain. ================================================================ Now I suggest that it is not "a highly concentrated matrix of protons and electrons" but a Beta-atmosphere of materons that are being condensed by the intensely high pF Beta atmosphere vacua generated by dnL/dTn motion. Both Ing.Saviour and I have quite independently recognised that mass has the dimension of T/L (see http://www.blazelabs.com/) and it is evident that materons have "hidden mass". Just consider this account by D.L.Hotson talking about himself in the third person. I have pasted it from Bill Beaty's excellent web site, ================================================== "...Unfortunately, he could not resist asking awkward questions. His professors taught that conservation of mass-energy is the never-violated, rock-solid foundation of all physics. In 'pair-production', a photon of at least 1.022 MeV 'creates' an electron-positron pair, each with 0.511 MeV of rest energy, with any excess being the momentum of the 'created' pair. So supposedly the conservation books balance. But the 'created' electron and positron both have spin (angular momentum) energy of h/4p. By any assumption as to the size of electron or positron, this is far more energy than that supplied by the photon at 'creation'. 'Isn't angular momentum energy?' he asked a professor. 'Of course it is. This half-integer spin angular momentum is the energy needed by the electron to set up a stable standing wave around the proton. Thus it is responsible for the Pauli exclusion principle, hence for the extension and stability of all matter. You could say it is the sole cause of the periodic table of elements.' 'Then where does all this energy come from? How can the 'created' electron have something like sixteen times more energy than the photon that supposedly 'created' it? Isn't this a huge violation of your never-violated rock-solid foundation of physics?' 'We regard spin angular momentum as an 'inherent property' of electron and positron, not as a violation of conservation.' 'But if it's real energy, where does it come from?' 'Inherent property' means we don't talk about it, and you won't either if you want to pass this course.' Later, Mr. Hotson was taken aside and told that his 'attitude' was disrupting the class, and that further, with his 'attitude', there was no chance in hell of his completing a graduate program in physics, so 'save your money'. He ended up at the Sorbonne studying French literature and later became a professional land surveyor." ================================================ I sure some smart Vortexian will be able to calculate how many materons are needed to make a proton - or even a neutron perhaps, since this will soon decay to a proton and an electron. Cheers Grimer
