Frederick Sparber wites,

> Could the (*e-) neutralized Oxygen atom be a WIMP?   :-)


Well, that's a shocker for sure, Fred. But I'll try to do
you one better  ;-)


In neutron decay, your end up with a proton, electron, and
(supposedly) an electron antineutrino, but here is the big
surprise.

The *rest mass* difference between the neutron and the
(combined proton + electron) is 0.7823 MeV or thereabouts,
depending on whose figures you trust. Just as with the
lifetime of the neutron itself, many experts have deferring
opinions on this precise number, despite it being so
fundamental to our understanding of nature. Makes one wonder
about their other pronouncements as well... don't it, Vern ?

Now, it is usually said that the difference between the
neutron and the (proton + electron) which is over one and a
half times the mass of a single electron, is converted into
the kinetic energy of the neutrino.  There is absolutely NO
firm evidence for this proposition, however, as the neutrino
mass itself has not yet been quantified. Consequently one is
free to ponder whether of not this *very significant*
difference mentioned above of at least .78 MeV which exists
between the neutron and the (proton + electron) which is
over one and a half times the mass of an electron, is
actually rest energy which is converted into the kinetic
energy of the neutrino.

Maybe not.

Perhaps a neutron itself (which is three quarks in one
perspective) is not (effectively) a proton, electron, and an
electron antineutrino, but instead (effectively) a proton
bound to an (*e-) with or without an electron antineutrino
thrown in for good measure (and to balance out a few QM
issues) !!!

And you thought this was going to be a dull Monday...

Jones


Reply via email to