I have never tried to track the actual rate of acceleration vs time with recording instruments, but the vibration monitor can make one wonder if mass can be visualized as "elastic".
Richard
----- Original Message ----- From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:48 AM
Subject: RE: Dimensions of mass
It is interesting to find that the definition of acceleration is lopsided. This leads to acceleration being given dimensions which are biased, i.e. [L]/[T]^2
You can see this for yourselves by going though the process of defining acceleration's reciprocal starting with the inverse of velocity, namely, change in time per unit length.
The only unbiased way to treat acceleration and its inverse democratically is to use [L].[L]/[T].[T] = [L]/[T].[L]/[T] or velocity squared.
What a mess. It's not just Mass that's been ridden over roughshod. Simone Weil was right.
Grimer

