|
Jain is "edging up" to the idea of electronium, but he is not quite there
yet:
According to Jain: "Composite fermions are a new class of fermions discovered in condensed matter physics. A composite fermion is the bound state of an electron and an even number of quantized vortices (often thought of as an electron carrying an even number of magnetic flux quanta). When a two-dimensional electron system is exposed to a strong transverse magnetic field, electrons minimize their interaction energy by capturing an even number of quantized vortices to transform into composite fermions." In the model of electronium which Frederick Sparber and myself are trying
to flesh-in, positronium could supply Jain's strong transverse magnetic field,
but unlike his concept, we see the process beginning with two electrons and one
positron (IOW the "even number" is 1/2 of the positron's quantized vortex, and
Jain is "off" considerably by starting at one instead of 1/2 and especially by
totally neglecting the antiparticle.
Some other tidbits from Jain "Composite fermions were originally
predicted theoretically to explain the remarkable phenomenon of the "fractional
quantum Hall effect" (FQHE), but are now known to describe a superstructure that
encompasses other phenomena as well."
Indeed.
"Since its inception, the composite fermion concept has been critically
examined through a large number of tests, within and beyond the FQHE, which have
established a close correspondence between the reality and the composite fermion
theory."
If Fred and I are correct, then Jain did not run the most important test -
the one which would describe and pinpoint the bound lepton triad
(*e-).
"It is experimentally established that composite fermions fill a fermi sea
(the composite-fermion fermi sea)"
YES. Half-right. This is apparently the critical juncture where Jain falls
short. He considerers the "Fermi Sea" but fails to see that it connects
across a short interface directly into the "Dirac sea"...
IOW Jain's journey is reminiscent of Cristobal Colon sailing into the
Isthmus of Panama (which area once bore his name as well until we
usurped it too - just like his name) but not realizing that just a few
miles away was an even more imposing ocean.
Jones
Can you believe the arrogance of the Anglos to actually change the spelling
and total sound of a great explorer's name just because he was from another
(lesser?) culture, or was it supposedly because it wasn't all that easy to
pronounce (or maybe they didn't like the 'grave' implications of "not invented
here"... or maybe they thought it sounded too "internal" ) ?
Not that we can't pronounce cologne, but all of this is a racial hegemony
rant more appropriate for a later time......
|
