At 01:35 pm 15-11-04 +1300, you wrote: <snip>
>The fact is that relativity is wrong. >The aether drift experiments show there is a drift. >Drift has been detected by all experiments. > >But not a drift through an absolute universal frame (a rather absurd >notion), but an aether entrained and dragged by the earth. > >Time dilation and length contraction and so much that relativity claim >is indeed true, except it's not relative. >The effects are results of moving through the aether. > >Now, one thing on my mind, that few seem to consider is the Bernoulli >effect being considered as physics not just fluid dynamics. >Simply stated, the faster a fluid moves, it's pressure drops. >But how can its pressure simply drop? It must actually shrink or >experience width contraction? and moving relative to what? >And if fluids shrink (experiences significant width contraction when >they move) then why wouldn't solid matter? (unless fluids don't entrain >the aether but solids do) > >Oh is the Bernoulli not real after all? (I do believe there is some debate) > >Here is some reading: >http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_supr.htm Excellent post John. 8-) And you are so right about Bernoulli. As you imply, we should be thinking about a whole hierarchy of aethers. I deal with this point in our Southampton paper which I've posted to Ing.Saviour of Blaze Labs. He is setting up a new web site in addition to his Yahoo site. At present he seems to be having problems in getting the files organised but I'll post the URL of the Southampton paper on Vortex when it appears. Cheers Grimer >Grimer wrote: > >>I once had the good fortune to be invited to Dr Essen's house to >>discuss my work on the Beta-aether/atmosphere. The other day >>whilst googling "Mikhail Gershteyn" I came across this rather >>interesting essay of his. >> >>I hope it's not considered too off topic - it does after all >>finish up with an observation I'm sure most Vortexians will >>agree with, viz., >> >> ==================================================== >> It is sad if [Vall�e's] ideas were not fully studied >> because the nuclear fusion programmes throughout >> the world seem to make little progress in spite >> of the billions spent on them. >> ==================================================== >> >>...and many more billions since Louis wrote that. >> >> >>======================================================== >> >>---------- >>RELATIVITY >>---------- >> >>Einstein�s theory of relativity was dealt with very >>briefly in my university course....... <snip>
