At 09:03 pm 21-11-04 -0600, you wrote: > The good news is that the event is reproducible,
That is indeed excellent news. 8-) >the bad news is we don't have a clue how to understand >the mechanics except that it must be related to cavitation >of a type we have not experienced before. Indeed, it may very well be. 8-) >Setting aside the many wild and far out claims of many vortex buffs, >somewhere in the scheme of things there is a relationship between your >work in CF and ours in liquid vortex technology. I agree. I suspect you may be generating a engineering scale pF cavity in the water - a Beta-atmosphere vacuum in the water, in other words. That would certainly cause "the entire unit with electric motor to move on its mounting." And if you are generating a engineering scale pF cavity in the water, you will be the first people in the world able to provide incontrovertible evidence of the conditions necessary for sono-fusion. How does that idea grab you? ;-) If you're interested, I'll upload you our very first published paper on the subject explaining this discovery. I've only got it as .jpeg scan pages so it takes a few minutes to come through. As an engineer you would probably appreciate it - None of that nuculer (sic) malarkey. 8-) Well, almost none, as Gibert might have put it. ;-) Cheers Grimer
