Horace wrote: > At 1:07 AM 11/27/4, Frederick Sparber wrote: > > >I think "Palladium loading" is a Red Herring to get around the fact that > >LENR-CANR is an Interfacial Potential Effect. > > There is a huge body of literature that says otherwise. How do you account > for a major difference in results using H/Pd controls vs D/Pd for example? > How do you account for observed changes in crystaline structure indicating > thermal hot spots *inside* the cathode?
Amen to Horace's comments. To which I may add the occasional extreme bursts of energy seen by very careful investigators, which led to holes burned in tables, and the precaution of dumping a very hot cell into a pail of water, only to have it evaporate several pailsful? Or the phenomenon of "heat after death" when the cathode stays hot for hours after the electrolyte has boiled away? Or the production of helium from a cell in a quantitiy conmeasurant with excess heat produced? Or the very well controlled, confirmed, transmutation of Cs to Pr by infusion of deuterium gas? Or the observation of excess heat and transmutation in situations with no electgric field? Frederick needs to do some homework at www.lenr-canr.org. Mike Carrell > > Regards, > > Horace Heffner > > > > >
