Hi Jones, Thank you for such a nice greeting. Comments below, Geoff Haselhurst (GH)
Will enjoy reading your posts, but will not be able to contribute much as i have a rather large website that is in great need of work. Sincerely, Geoff Haselhurst http://www.spaceandmotion.com
Greetings, You have done a nice job on your website, and probably get way too little in the form of recognition from its world-wide audience. Thanks for keeping it going.... Many who are influenced by your work, and appreciative, will nevertheless not take the time to comment, and instead will probably "borrow" your ideas with impunity. Like the other kind of "surfing," the beneficiaries of free information-availability often take too much for granted.
GH - Well said, we do like to get some respect for our work, and the internet can be a bit brutal at times, people take things for granted without showing much appreciation (and a bit of mocking!). But amongst the amny there are nice people who offer praise and encouragement (as you have), and help make it worth while. So thankyou! The website stresses me because i know how quickly it was constructed (as an experiment to see how to get pages to rank well in Google and thus read on the internet) and how poorly parts are written. I have learnt a lot over past year, I hope to now apply this knowledge and greatly improve both website and how it performs on internet. I do support the free access of free knowledge (my website is released as a GNU FDL) so anyone can copy and use it. And i also get a few nice letters each week which is encouraging. But it is early days, and hard to know what effect this website / WSM knowledge has, or how most people perceive it and the idea that we can know reality (which is pretty radical, and in the realm of crackpots unfortunately).
You may find that this group is somewhat more oriented towards presenting alternate speculation and hypothesis, which might better serve to explain anomalies, especially those in LENR (low energy nuclear reactions) rather than in supporting or developing any one theory. The group definitely seems oriented toward trying to isolate aspects of any theory (the aspects relating to energy) and trying to find ways to test that in experiment.
GH - This is encouraging. I look forward to learning more from you.
Don't want to put you on the spot with an immediate off-the-wall question, but... The obvious unknown which many of us would have in regard to using or applying WSM to alternative energy research would be: do you see any components of WSM which can be tested experimentally, and which might lead to improvements in either extracting energy from previously unused sources, or in maximizing the way we extract energy from the common sources? Regards, Jones Beene
GH - You make me smile! What a lovely question to stop a theorist in their
tracks.
My early thoughts (which are a bit rambling - sorry).
1. At the moment I cannot offer a precise experiment, I have too little
knowledge. My ideas are founded mainly on philosophy and metaphysics, though
i do also have reasonable knowledge of the history and evolution of
theoretical physics. I do plan on learning more about LENR and current
experiments, and hope in time that I can offer some sensible thoughts on
experiments.
2. However, by providing principles / metaphysical foundations for reality,
the WSM would certainly present experimentalists with a different world
view, and this would eventually lead to different experiments being imagined
and tested (that would not normally be considered). And if the WSM is true,
then you would expect some of these to be successful.
3. The WSM suggests that matter is large (a structure of the universe, and
resonating with other matter in the universe). I live in the wilderness
of SW Australia (a hermit philosopher!), and generate my own electricity with
solar panels (which powers this computer and these emails - a nice thought).
While solar energy is accepted by everyone, LENR is not (yet they are both
forms of 'spooky free energy from space' as i see things).
The WSM explains why we can
capture energy from matter in the space around us, because that space is our
matter (as spherical standing waves in space). These electron wave
structures form discrete standing wave patterns in atoms / molecules
(related to Schrodinger Wave Equations) which can change from one wave
pattern / function to another. This occurs because electrons must be acting
as spherical resonators and can resonantly couple with other matter wave
resonances in space around them. This is how WSM explains discrete energy
states (QT) for both light and matter (rather than using conception of
'particles' - thus eliminating many problems from science caused by the
discrete particle conception of matter). The credit for this work belongs
largely to Milo Wolff (though i now get quite a few wave theorists
writing to me, and others have also found similar things).
As i understand WSM / physics it is more rare / difficult to get nuclear changes to occur, as the binding energy between wave structures is much stronger. In WSM terms I suppose the wave sharing is much closer, and the wave amplitudes much greater, thus it takes a larger wave amplitude interaction to break this bond. I assume that radioactive decay occurs because in a wave universe from time to time wave interactions will cause tightly bound wave structures to break apart. I realise this is far from satisfactory for mathematical physicists, and requires careful mathematical treatment way beyond my abilities. Anyway, the point of the ramble is that you must work out what wave interactions are required to break apart your wave structures (which are bound together by being trapped in repeating wave patterns). And here I have assumed fission, but I suppose this also applies to fusion, and getting wave centers / particles to bind together (share in and out waves / form a repeating wave pattern). Whether there are practical ways to do this (e.g. at normal temperature) that liberate useful amounts of energy i don't know. But it certainly seems possible and worth exploring (considering the profoundly beneficial consequences to humanity possible with a clean 'free energy' source).
I hope that I can add substantially more to this over next few years. Again, my sincere thanks for your kind words. It is at times hard being a philosopher writing on truth and reality, kindness is greatly appreciated. Geoff Haselhurst
CC Milo Wolff, WSM Group - Any thoughts on LENR (Cold Fusion)?
