"Johnson, Steven" wrote:
> >From: Edmund Storms > > > NRL is now attempting to duplicate this work. This program was > > undertaken well before the DoE review and apparently was unknown > > to the reviewers. If, as expected, they replicate the Iwamura > > claims, the ball game will be over. > > > >Ed > > Hello Ed, > > Best guestamate as to when NRL will complete & publish their findings? I have no way of knowing this. I guess we are looking at about 6 months. They want to be very sure of the results. > > > Assuming the findings are confirmed and the "ball game" IS over, what is > likely to happen next? The flood gates open and people in the CF field become heroes and are asked to help develop the field. Park becomes a "believer" and criticizes the DoE for being so slow. Hell might even freeze over. Ed > > > Regards, > > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > > George Holz wrote: > > > Hi Jed, > > > > > See: > > > > > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf > > > > > > - Jed > > > > The results described in these papers show that the > > impurity migration idea is even more ridiculous (if that's possible) > > than before. The isotope of the starting element controls the > > isotope of the transmuted element. Explain that by contamination! > > > > Is there any way we can have this information forwarded to the > > DOE reviewers. Perhaps they may find that it is time to save > > their reputations by admitting the obvious. > > Duplicating the Iwamura experiment with additional starting elements > > seems like a reasonable suggestion to the DOE as a proposed > > experiment to improve our understanding of LENR. Perhaps some of the > > national labs have appropriate equipment that could be used > > by LENR researchers to speed further work. How can anyone deny the > > overwhelming theoretical and practical significance of this work! > > > > Thank you Jed for obtaining and posting this material. > > > > George Holz > > Varitronics Systems > > > > > > > > > > >
