Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Jed Rothwell continues his high-bandwidth falsehoods.
First, Rothwell got the papers in title before ICCF10, in follow-up by email, in the listing FROM ICCF10, and thereafter over and over and over.
Yes. As I said, I cut them from the database along with McKubre, Hagelstein, and several others who never submitted papers. (As far as I know they did not.)
A title does not a paper make.
Second, at least some of those who contacted me about the Storms-Rothwell censorship at the misnamed LENR/CANR website, DID contact at least one of them.
And who would that be? Santa Claus?
Third, there is the following outright bogus Rothwell rant.
Rothwell: "1. Oral presentations do not count. Do these papers exist in writing?"
The proof that Rothwell is utterly disingenuous is that he was personally handed
each of these papers (the papers, and not just the censored titles removed from the
"List of Titles") when as a courtesy I drove him from Dr. Eugene Mallove's funeral
in New Hampshire to Boston near the Boston Commons.
That did not look like a paper to me. It was a couple of graphs with no explanation of what they were, or what they meant. Was that submitted to Hagelstein for the proceedings?
Anyway, I do not keep paper copies of anything. If you have a paper, you must upload it to your web site, and then give me the URL. If you do not consider this paper -- or these graphs, or whatever they were -- good enough for your website, and you do not consider them good enough to submit to Hagelstein, then I suppose they are not good enough for LENR-CANR.org. So let's drop the subject.
The transfer of the papers in-hand to the disingenuous and ungrateful Rothwell was witnessed by people astonished at his claim, "Do these papers exist in writing?" His disingenuity is amazing.
I do not deal with papers on paper. I cannot upload them and I will not scan them. I did read those graphs but I could not understand what they were about, so I tossed them out.
I could respond to the rest of Rothwell's cornucopia of falsehoods but they
would just continue to flow. In cold fusion, we are very disappointed that Rothwell
has continued to hurt the field for so long with his inaccurate posts . . .
Whose we? Do you have worms? If you want something uploaded, cut the crap, answer the following questions, and it WILL be uploaded within a few hours:
1. Oral presentations do not count. Do these papers exist in writing?
2. Did you submit them to Peter Hagelstein?
3. Are they available on your web site and if so, would you like me to upload copies?
4. If you would like me to upload them, what is the exact URL? I will not go on a wild goose chase through your web site looking for them.
Of course you will not do that because you want to pretend I am persecuting you by listing only 28 of your papers instead of 30. That is a peculiar way to persecute someone! If you would like, I will delete the other 28. Just ask, in writing, in this forum. Then you will have a much larger imaginary beef. You can go around complaining I deleted 28 papers, and you deny you ever asked me. A few idiots may believe you.
What are you going to if I go ahead and add those two titles, anyway? You will have nothing to scream about. No pretend persecution to whine about. I think I will do that, just out of spite! Why not? Even if the papers do not exist, no one will ever know, because no one will read the ICCF10 proceedings even if they are published. A little more garbage in the database will not hurt.
- Jed
