At 11:52 pm 06-12-04 -0900, you wrote:
>At 11:01 PM 12/6/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
>>Hi Terry.
>>
>>You will see from their scope graph
>>
>>http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1/041110
>>
>>that the light speed pulse is larger than both; measuring from the peak like
>>that can be deceptive as they show. I also agree with
>>the authors that a "signal velocity" or what I might call
>>a shock wave velocity need be measured.
>
>
>It seems to me that if the group velocity can be sensed at 3*c then that
>constitutes data transmitted FTL.
>
>Live data can thus be sent FTL using parallel data cables (or fibers) for a
>single bit (a bundle), and parallel bundles of cables for a binary word,
>provided it is known *with good confidence* an interval for the arrival of
>some indication of the value of each of the parallel data bits in a word.
>
>Multiple cables can be used to transmit each bit, including multiple cables
>to transmit (initiate) the timing (strobe) pulse which starts the sensing
>interval for a binary word.  In this manner multi-bit words can be sent FTL
>asynchronously.  The first indication of a signal on any cable for a given
>bit then sets that bit.  This would not be 100 percent reliable, but
>neither is any other form of transmission.  An indication of both a 1 and a
>0 value for a given bit would trigger error processing.  If 32 cables were
>used to transmit a pulse indicating a 1 bit in a given position of a binary
>word, and 32 cables used to indicate a 0 bit in that word position, then it
>is known with great reliability much faster than the speed of light if a
>given bit is 0, 1, or in error.   Transmitting an 8 bit byte (with parity)
>in parallel would take 9*64 + 32 = 608 cables.  It may be worthwhile to
>dedicate 64 cables to the timing pulse bundle, which is always a 1 bit, for
>reliability in identifying an earliest possible start for the strobe window.
>The 640 cables is extravagant, but so what.  It's just a proof of
>principle.


So what indeed.  

A very clear explanation Horace. 
Even I managed to follow that.   8^)

Cheers

Grimer

Reply via email to