At 10:58 PM 12/8/4, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>Horace Heffner wrote:
[snip]
>> I am curious as to just why it is thought the huge polar jets of material
>> fly out of black holes and neutron stars.
For this part of the question I would expect someone in the astrophysics
business to have a conventional answer.
>An analagous (and additional)
>> polar gravitational field should develop in the vicinity of black holes, if
>> the analysis is done according to the gravimagnetic isomorphism I proposed
>> on this list anyway.
>
>I think I just fell into the deep end of the pool here...
>
>'Way past me, Horace! :-)
I am sure it is not! Its pretty simple (minded). I do very much
appreciate, and this is no joke, anyone not wanting to spend much time
responding on the basis of and in the terminology of wacko non-conventional
and time consuming theories like mine though! I am not expecting you to
respond to this.
Just in case you wonder a bit what it is about, though, the isomorphism is
established by applying the following correspondence rules to *every*
electromagnetic law in order to obtain corresponding gravitational laws.
Replace c, mu_0 and epsilon_0 with corresponding terms c_g, mu_g_0, and
epsilon_g_0 above. Co-gravity K is defined as the gravitational equivalent
to (corresponds under the isomorphism to) B, the magnetic field intensity
B. Gravity g is defined as the gravitational equivalent of the
electrostatic field E. Wherever charge is used, gravitational mass
(gravitational charge) is substituted, with the sign of the charge removed
(if ordinary matter is involved, i.e. not anti-gravitational matter) and
replaced by the imaginary number i. J_g is the mass current vector
corresponding to current density vector J. For the sake of simplicity here
assume c = c_g.
We then have the full correspondence:
Electric Gravitational
q m * i
E g
B K
J J_g
epsilon_0 epsilon_g_0 = 1.192602x10^9 kg s^2/m^3
mu_0 mu_g_0 = 1.037x10^-25 m/kg
c c_g = c
Table 3: Gravity-electromagnetism Isomorphism
Correspondence Table
The number i above is the square root of minus 1. Values that are
imaginary are gravitational. Values that are real are electromagnetic and
can be sensed in the 4 real dimensions. F = m*a, for example, is based on
inertial mass m, having no imaginary component, and thus is an
electromagnetic equation resulting in a real force on the inertial mass m.
It is fairly simple to apply if you have the right kind of pocket
calculator. The imaginary and real dimensions intersect influences then
where a particle carries both gravitational charge and inertial mass.
I'll post a more complete summary of the isomorphism and terminology,
giving proper credit to Jefimenko, from whom it was derived almost in its
entirety, under the thread name "Gravimagnetism".
A much more complete discussion was posted in April under the thread names"
"GR, QM, and Field Unification (DRAFT #3, Part 1)",
"GR, QM, and Field Unification (DRAFT #3, Part 2)",
"GR, QM, and Field Unification (DRAFT #3, Part 3)".
Regards,
Horace Heffner
