first off, teh second tower to go DID break a bit, and ive seen home video of a friend that matches. now, WHY it did it, who knows.
also, the missile defense shield is feasible. look at patriot. and it hasnt failed yet. they just kept aborting the tests due to weather. that said, its a waste of time and money, and there is no need for it. On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:42:08 -0600, RC Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jed, .. Ya gotta believe it's possible to hit a missile with a missile, even > Gene Autry could draw and shoot so fast his bullet hit the bullet fired by > the bad guy.. didn't you watch it happen in the movies? If you saw Gene > Autry do it.. it happened!! > That shouldn't be any more difficult to believe than what you saw when the > twin towers disintergrated in perfect lockstep.. a miracle they didn't tip > over but collapsed floor by floor. We saw it happen on television.. the REAL > thing.. Pay no attention to the structural engineer with the math to > demonstrate there is NO way for the structural integrity of the tower to > fail in such a perfect way, I don't care what arguments are used for the > superb steel core making such a collapse impossible.. everybody knows it > happened just like it showed on TV. > So why can't a missile shoot down a missile regardless of trajectory and > speed.. Gene Autry knows best and a few more dollars spent to prove it makes > sense to any defense contractor, just ask a terrorist that uses fertilizer. > Or.... errr.. BS !! its all the same.. ask a Texan. > > Richard -- Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten. -G.K. Chesterton
