Hi Mark, > Since we've had X-ray crystallography and computerized molecular modelling for decades, wouldn't the position (and the activity with respect to protons) of every atom in the pore molecules of that membrane be known by now?
With respect to "normal" metabolism, yes. My speculation relates only to those few species which have manged to survive and flourish in situations where it "seems" like they are expending more energy than can be accounted for in caloric intake. I do not believe that there is any scientific study which has looked closely at this specific issue with an open mind. > I think Gurdjieff spoke of "higher hydrogens" ! Well, I am not up to speed on that but if it relates to the hydrino, whether it be the Mills' hydrino or the same beast from another perspective, it should probably be called "lower hydrogen" ! > > And this form of hydrogen exploitation is definitely risky, health-wise, so it had not been fully exploited by evolution and only appears in organisms with intense energy requirements. > I can't believe that Mills, an M.D., hasn't fed hydrinos to a few rats, and the fact that he won't admit it and tell the results has me worried about toxicity. OR... else the hydrino reverts back to normal hydrogen too quickly in digestion. I doubt if it is either toxic or stable (for extended periods) in the redundant ground state; and feeding it would likely not provide much benefit, energywise; especially if no natural or evolved containment structure is in place. And since the small size of the hydrino allows it to penetrate any solid material, it would likely disperse through any rodent (if that species is not equiped to utilize it) - as soon as it was released from whichever hydride state it was in when fed. OTOH, such science-geniuses as "Randi" have claimed to "smell a rat" in Mills' work, so maybe BLP has a secret breeding program underway under the auspices of so-called "Homeland Security" or whatever other nazi-esque secret bureau is involved. Ha! and if any test animal is inadvertently released near their traditional home, the rat-lands near Crawford, they will surely give Barney, no doubt an excellent ratter, a new challenge. But being both a handsome Scottie, and the most intelligent member of that clan, he will quickly eradicate the problem, hydino-powered or no. > Then there's spontaneous human combustion. When was this discussed on the list? I couldn't find the posts. You can go to the vortex "thread archives": http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex/ and search by keyword, such as "SHC" > BTW, I can't figure out what "electronium" is. Not surprising !: The original impetus for the existence of electronium (*e-) comes from the string theory of Frederick Sparber, in which the "strings" are best visualized as disks or loops (the snake eating its tail) and from analogizing the quark formative process extending to leptons. As such, I suspect that Fred imagines the (*e-) triad to have the appearance of a stack of three rings, the center being counter-spin to the other two but with an *aligned axis* of the three (electron positron electron)or check the archives for such posts: http://www.escribe.com/science/vortex/m31674.html > Are there bacteria that generate hydrogen gas? If so, do they make monoatomic hydrogen first? If they have any potassium ion in them, there should be hydrinos... Yup, but for how long befor they reinflate? > To me the important thing is whether he's correct about the details of _what_ is happening in his experiments, not his underlying explanation of _why_ it's happening (CQM). I could not agree more. His experimental work is impressive. > Yowie! What is "reciprocal space"? It is actually a well-known mathematical and physical construct which has been taken out of context by yours-truly and made to align with the locus of Dirac's sea for several reasons that are most obvious to mathematicians. > And how can a hydrino become a bare proton? What happens to the electron? It would take much more energy to remove it from a hydrino than from a hydrogen atom. But it does not need to be removed. Once the atomic size shrinks near the "interface" between our 3-space and reciprocal space, probably about 50 picometers, there is a probability of either the proton or its shrunken electron, or both, tunneling far enough into the "other side" of the interface to disrupt the "quantum foam" of "virtual positronium"... after which it can either bring back into our 3-space the 6.8 eV ionization energy or else an electronium itself (*e-), or else disappear ir there is a large accumulated deficit onthat side. At least Fred and I often subscribe to this hypothesis... especially when it is most convenient ;-) > Wouldn't it be possible to test this ZPE hypothesis by creating and then re-inflating hydrinos and seeing if there's a net energy gain? Hopefully. Perhaps that is already one of the energy sources of cold fusion, and many other anomalies. > But if hydrinos are readily re-inflated by ZPE, > wouldn't Mills' hydrino compounds be unstable? Yup. > If your hypothesis is correct, then hummingbirds should glow in the UV, right? They do, but that does not mean the hypothesis is correct - but only that iridescence and UV are so intertwined in a generic sense, that there could exist both a connection and an evolutionary pathway for utilizing (an tolerating large doses) UV photons... Jones
