Nick Reiter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, the politics of antic semantics or semantic antics > are getting threadbare. Time for a chew toy. > > One of the voices in the wilderness of gravity and > antigravity research that I have never seen kicked > around here on Vortex is the eternally running > campaign by "Uncle Al" Schwartz having to do with > chirality and parity violation. The page is still the > same: > > http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm > > I swapped mails with Al a couple years back. I > thought that maybe some of what I was seeing at the > time with minor weight transients in chiral crystals > would fit his modelling. Al was skeptical, but > honestly so, as I am myself. Anyone out there ever > dip into Schwartz's work in a theoretical way, or try > any experiments with chiral masses as he suggests?
I think any measure of weight, is really a measure of inertia. Thus a change in weight is really a change in the inertia of the body. The only way to definitely measure a change in gravity is to measure the time of fall from a given height. As you can see I prefer 'anti-inertia' research to 'anti-gravity' research. Harry
