The answer I supplied challenges the question. The question is leading to use a legal term.
An origin question presumes the subject in question must have an origin. Contemporary science and creationists tend to organise themselves so as to provide answers to such "inescapable" questions. Creationists will continue to annoy scientists until science begins to question the question. Contemporary science lacks vigour because it has become consumed by the question of origin. Harry Keith Nagel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi RC > > Richard writes: >> Mr big discounted as an unresponsive answer. > > Wow, I couldn't have put that more succinctly myself. > > So can we assume that you've given up on the creationist notion? (grin) > > Mind you, I'm not asking if you accept Darwins theories. Just whether > you agree with your own statement that Mr Big is a non-answer to > the question of the creation of the universe. > > K. >
