In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911
Thank goodness Mizuno and his guest were not seriously injured; I hope their hearing recovers. This event could be very significant. If the estimate of 2-3 cc of hydrox gas mixture is right, it doesn't seem that this could have been the source of the explosion. If I remember correctly, I collected that much in a plastic pill bottle by electrolysis when I was a kid, and it just made a little "pop" when ignited. The size of the explosion seems more like what would be produced by a medium-size firecracker -- a few cc of gunpowder, thus about 1000 (the density ratio of solid to gas) times as much explosive material and energy as the same volume of gas. Possibilities might be either that the electrolyte was full of (incipient?) hydrinos that underwent a chain reaction (if the observed expansion of the white light was not just a perceptual artifact), or some kind of very tiny nuclear reaction occurred at the cathode. Did they have any nuclear radiation/particle detectors there, even a film dosimeter? This may be a major breakthrough, and it was with light water! Hopefully the effect can be replicated (under safe conditions), and filmed through a telescopic lens. On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:22:57AM -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: >[I will upload an Acrobat version of this report that includes photographs.] > >Accident Report > >Tadahiko Mizuno >Division of Quantum Energy Engineering, >Research group of Nuclear System Engineering >Hokkaido University >E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On January 24, 2005 at around 4:00 p.m. an explosion occurred during a >plasma electrolysis experiment being performed by Mizuno in the Quantum >Energy Engineering Section. > >The cell was a 1000 cc Pyrex glass vessel which has been in use for about 5 >years. It contained 700 cc of 0.2M K2CO3 electrolyte; a platinum mesh >anode; and a tungsten cathode wire 1.5 mm in diameter, 29 cm long, with 3 >cm exposed to the electrolyte. Electrolyte temperature was 20 deg C. The >cell was placed inside a constant temperature air-cooled incubator (Yamato >1L-6) with the outer door open, and the inner Plexiglas safety door closed. >The experimental setup is described in Ref. 1. The event occurred in the >early stage of the experiment before a plasma normally forms. Soon after >ordinary electrolysis began, voltage was increased to 20 V and current to >1.5 A. 5 or 6 seconds later, a bright white flash was seen on the lower >portion of the cathode. The light expanded and at the same instant the cell >exploded. > >The explosion blew open the Plexiglas safety door and spread shards of >Pyrex glass and electrolyte up to 5 ~ 6 m into the surrounding area. > >When the explosion occurred, Mizuno and a guest visiting the laboratory >(who wishes to remain anonymous) were observing the cell about 1 m from the >incubator. They were wounded in the face, neck, arms and chest by shards of >glass 1 ~ 5 cm long. Fortunately, there were no injuries to their eyes. The >injuries are light, and they are expected to recover in a week. However, >the explosion made such a tremendous noise both victims were temporarily >rendered completely deaf. It is not known whether this will have any >after-effects. > > >Possible Causes > >The vessel was old and may have had a scratch on the inner surface. > >The effluent hydrogen and oxygen were mixed in the cell headspace. There 2 >~ 3 cc of hydrogen at the time, although this is an open cell so only >minimal amounts of gas remain in the headspace. > >It is possible that the tungsten cathode may have been exposed to the gas >in the headspace. > > >Recommendations > >Researchers performing similar glow discharge experiments are advised to >make an experimental setup that can undergo an explosion without >endangering personnel. Care should be taken not only to protect against >shards and fragments, but also to avoid exposure to the extreme noise of an >explosion. > >Voltage, current and electrolyte temperature were below the levels needed >to form a glow discharge, so it is unclear what might have caused the >explosion. > > >Countermeasures > >Here are some basic protective steps that should be taken in all >experiments of this nature: > >Perform experiments under remote control, with power supplies and meters >placed a safe distance from the cell. > >Use an explosion-proof cell vessel and equipment chamber. > >Do not use glass cells. (We are now investigating alternative materials.) > >All glass and plastic vessels should be wrapped with filament tape to >prevent fragmentation. > >Prevent mixing and recombination of effluent hydrogen and oxygen. However, >it would be impossible to prevent mixing during the glow discharge phase >when both gasses are generated at the cathode. > >Use nontoxic or reduced toxicity electrolyte solutions. > >Always use safety glasses, helmets, faceguards and an acrylic blast screen. > >While we have not concluded this incident was caused by a cold fusion >reaction, be aware that cold fusion is still poorly understood and >difficult to control. > >Be aware that in normal operation these systems often produce intense >ultra-violet rays that can damage unprotected eyes; and they can produce >intense magnetic fields and possibly x-rays and neutrons. Take steps to >protect yourself from these as well. > >References > >1. Mizuno, T., T. Ohmori, and T. Akimoto. Generation of Heat and Products >During Plasma Electrolysis. in Tenth International Conference on Cold >Fusion. 2003. Cambridge, MA: LENR-CANR.org. >http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTgeneration.pdf > >
