Gnorts!

  One of the misconceptions regarding the research done by private industry is 
that private industry would publish their work, or even let it be known that 
work was being done in a particular field by that industry in the first place.  
Private industry only reports on what it does if it is legally required to do 
so, or if there is some kind of public relations advantage to informing the 
public of its actions.

  The above is true for every aspect of its operation from payroll to tax 
accounting procedures to suppliers to the names of the members of the board of 
directors, etc., etc..  Research direction is particularly well hidden so as 
not to tip off the competition as to any new products that may be introduced in 
the future.  This is just the way private industry operates.

  If you want to get an indication of how many people, and sometimes even the 
identities of the people or organizations, who are doing research in your 
particular field, simply publish your work, and then read the logs on your 
computer firewall.  You will find the addresses of the computers that are 
trying to gain access to your computer.  In many cases, you can trace the 
numerical addresses back directly to the registered owners of those addresses.  
It was a hobby of mine for quite some time, and I must say, it was fascinating.

  University high energy physics labs, heavy industry companies, energy 
consultant firms, engineering companies, domestic and foreign governments, all 
will want to get into your computer to find out more about who you are and 
exactly what you are doing.  Practically none (and believe me, I have looked 
hard...) of these entities ever published a single word about their own 
endeavors in the field.  In the few cases where they did, the information was 
very general and usually written to attract new shareholders or generate sales 
of their own technologies.

  To say that the industrial world is not investigating cold fusion just 
because you don't read about it in the Wall Street Journal is extremely naive.  
The levels of funding, the names of the scientists, and who they are working 
for are a matter of speculation unless, of course, you can fund your own 
industrial espionage effort.  The fact remains, however, that the number and 
frequency of attempts to gain access to your particular research efforts are a 
good indication that serious efforts are underway by private industry in this 
field.  It is also proof that these entities still feel that theft of 
intellectual property is quite often cheaper and faster than doing the original 
research themselves.

Knuke

Reply via email to