Mitchell Swartz wrote: >>We put the titles back! They are in the database! > > Nonsense. The three papers are NOT in the ICCF-10 data base at > http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF10.htm > which is (inaccurately) entitled "
That list only includes papers that we have on file at LENR-CANR.org. Each paper in the list is linked to the copy in the library. There are 4 or 5 others that we know exist but we do not list, because the authors did not give us copies. For example, Hagelstein told me he wrote a paper but he never got around to giving me a copy, so I deleted his paper from that list. You -- Mitch -- never gave us papers, so after a while I assumed you never wrote any, and I deleted your papers from this list and from the master list. When you informed me that the papers do exist, I put them back in the master list. If you give me copies I will put them back in this list, too. Originally, this list included every paper that I heard about, including some duplicate entries. I cleaned it up months after ICCF10. In the ICCF9 special collection (http://www.lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF09.htm) there are about a dozen papers in the master list but not in the ICCF9 list, because the authors never gave me permission to upload them. Swartz is one of the authors who refused permission (so far, anyway). In the DoE special collection we have ony ~30 out of 130 papers that Hagelstein et al. provided to the DoE. That shows how shallow our collection really is, and how much more there is to read about CF. - Jed
