Ed Storms wrote:
and Mike Carrell responded;
I suggest several facts must be kept in mind when proposing the hydrino explanation.
1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not when accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal".
Correct.
I was discussing Patapov's Yusmar machine with David Moon. Tests reported excess amounts of C 14 in the water, which lead David to postulate a reaction of a Neupron with N to yield C 14. David's calculations required the input of energy in order to go from H to a neupron, which I assume is similar to a hydrino, except that according to Mills hydrino formation yields energy. OTOH, the environmental conditions necessary to facilitate hydrino formation may exceed the energy of hydrino production.
>2. Hydrino production can only be produced rather slowly, only as rapidly as normal H diffuses to the active site and the resulting hydrino diffuses away.
No. Hydrino production can proceed at any speed, including instantly. There
And they can form stable compounds which would allow them to accumulate. The big question is what set this event off?
>Nevertheless, I agree that too much energy seems to have been released> to be accounted for by a "normal" H2+O2 reaction.
What interests me is the speed of the reaction. It seems to me that given the interesting pattern of the cracks in the bottom of the vessel, a shock wave was responsible for the damage. Since the composition of the damaged material, and the distance from the event, to the damage is known, it should be possible to calculate the amount of energy, and the speed of it's release, required to cause the damage.
BTW, what's the final story on the funnel. was there one above the area of gas emission or not?
Remember F&P? Also unlikely.
Remember where you came from.
