Robin van Spaandonk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:44:27 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] >> I am not committed to big bang cosmology, but are there any non-big bang >> theories which predict the observed 2.7K cosmic background radiation? >> >> Harry >> > IMO the 2.7 K is simply degraded starlight. After all, what happens to the > thermal energy radiated by the planets, and interstellar dust and gas clouds? > It is simply the temperature of the universe. >
Ok. Sounds similar to Michael Foster's suggestion. Harry
