At 6:15 AM 2/7/5, Frederick Sparber wrote: >Horace Heffner wrote: >> >>You can always try aluminum loaded with H or D, as Kamada et al did in the >>two experiments described below: >> >Snip. > >No Horace.
Sure, Fred. Anyone can try it. 8^) > >The Proton + Li-7 Reaction P + 3 Li-7 ----> 2 He-4 + 17.6 Mev as well >as the D-D, D-Li & Possible Hydrino reactions are possible when you dump >750 joules per cubic millimeter ( 750 MegaJoules per cubic meter) or so, >into a capsule >of Lithium Hydride or Deuteride, creating plasma temperatures of around >1.5 Billion degrees K >and local pressures approaching several hundred kilobar or more. Similar energy densities can be dumped into lattice confined hydrogen bubbles. I don't think in either case hydrinos would be significanly involved, as the involved medium would be plasma. Energetically effective fusion created using electron beams I think is or would be essentially electron catalysed fusion. This requires a minimum beam intensity of 1x10^19 electrons/(cm^2*s), but I think improves with increased intensity. Achieving a fast, dense, and high energy electron flux imposed on inertially confined hydrogen might best be done using x-rays, however. I've seen no research using an x-ray technique designed to achieve the minimum high energy electron flux established by Kamada et al. Maybe it has been done, I just haven't seen it. > >If the Hydride/Deuteride can soak this up and rise to it's 680 C 25 >melting temperature and 25 Torr >pressure in a stainless steel capsule (I've run Lithium Heat Pipes at >white heat in 304 stainless) >an energy multiplication of 5 X input would be a high grade thermonuclear >heat source. Regards, Horace Heffner
