A copyright is simple and inexpensive. A registered trademark is more expensive. A patent can be much more expensive. A copyright has more protection than most patents. A registered trademark has near absolute rights. Unless there are strong circumstances, like a  major advancement in state of the art technology, a patent process is a waste of time and money. The energy devoted to the patent process can be a diversion and best spent on product quality, performance and name recognition.
Watching new business startups, notice the time and money they devote to selecting the design of their business card and office furniture.
Get there " fustest with the mostest" as the battlefield commander once stated. Later , if you wish to
play " Enron" displaying the crooked " E", you may have the money to do it but the wisdom to choose not to. 
In our market, we have the product in service, operating and have our money while our competitors devote their time merging several times over the past 10 years, destroying morale of their people each time they merge. They change names as often as we introduce new products. Guess who wins?
The old adage .. build a better mousetrap and customers will beat a path to your door is something a banker would come up with,not a businessman. Show me someone that can sell a product and we will build them faster than you can sell them.
Consider this simple comment and you will have a better insight into what " China" actually means. Sam Walton saw this years ago and tailored WalMart around the concept. Our government is working for our competitors by having advisors that have a banker mentality and lobbyists prove it everyday. This is the dirty little secret to the free trade issue. Our nation has the technology, we have marketing technology. we waste that resource on stuff like TV ads for the Superbowl.
 
Richard

 

<<Blank Bkgrd.gif>>

Reply via email to