At 3:07 AM 2/19/5, Colin Quinney wrote: >Funny you should mention *gravity wave* Jones... :-) > >http://web.tiscali.it/gravitationaldata/index.htm > Latest new February 13 / 2005. Go to test16.htm > > This is *not* ULF- electromagnetic, but an "M Sensor" here recording (see >graphs on page) during the Sumatra tsunami on Dec 25 / 04. More info on link. > > The physics behind this unusual sensor's mechanism of operation is not >recognized by standard physics. It's controversial. The >author has done extensive recordings over 10 years and claims that his >sensors receive G waves directly. (not seismometer, not radio waves). I >first came across this web site years ago, and so on a whim after reading >Jones' post I just checked it out to see if that Quasar Quake (previous post) >registered on his any of sensors.
This is really amazing stuff. There is a pdf on he site that gives construction details. Two comments immediately come to mind. First is that, given the posted theory that gravity waves change the permittivity and permability of space, then gravity waves can be detected by measuring rapid changes in the earth's magentic field, which would change if the permeability of space were changed. This could be done using an NMR based magnetometer. Scientific American had an amateur science project once that showed how to do this by wrapping a gallon bottle of water with wire, etc. Alternatively, changes in the magnetic field of any magnet that is well shielded from the environment could be measured accurately using NMR gaussimeter probes. The second thing that comes to mind is the possibility that space warping is not being measured, but rather actual graviphotons (as opposed to gravitons, which are analogous to virtual photons) as predicted by the Gravimagnetism theory I posted here a while back. Maybe the resistance of the CdS cell is affected by graviphotons. This would explain (the posted mystery) why a photometer aimed at the cell can not detect any change in incident light. The diode may be irrelevant to the experiment, except possibly for its use as a bias. It might be replaced by any light source, or possibly even turned off. It could also be that the sensititvty of the CdS cell is affected by graviphotons, possibly by energetically priming the outer electrons, in which case the ambient light is an essential ingrediant in the detection process, but need not come from the diode used. Regards, Horace Heffner
