> From: Jed Rothwell ...
> I am still mulling over that statement, and waiting for > some reactions. I will upload it later today or > tomorrow. Ed will probably want to tone it > down. Suggestions and corrections from readers here > are welcome. I was wondering when someone was going to react to the Sci. Am. March article. Actually, Jed, I'm surprised it took you this long! > We should also write a letter to Sci. Am., or > maybe add something to their on-line forum. My only suggestion would be to make sure to site specific references in which to back up LENR's claims. > Actually, this is the most positive thing Sci. Am. > has written about cold fusion since 1989. This is > progress, but it is much too slow and halting. "Non committal" would be my personal interpretation. DOE is sitting on the fence waiting for definitive proof, whatever that is, before they say: "I told you so..." A.C. Clarke has already described this behavior quite eloquently. > - Jed Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
