At 11:06 am 22-02-05 -0800, you wrote: >Fred, > >Once again we see evidence of extremely energetic mechanical >failure, which can be due to brittle failure, or to >phase-shift (allotrope) failure. This is totally >off-the-books of normal energy accounting because the energy >derives from ZPE. > >"By itself, when subjected to a sharp blow, an electric >spark, or when >heated to 110 - 120 deg C with a evolution of 19,600 >calories per gram". That's about 6 times the energy of >burning H2 plus O2 to a gram of water. :-)" Note that both >Antimony an Bismuth expand on solidifying." > >Yes. The similarity of exploding Sb with exploding ice is >striking. > >Using ice-9 instead of normal ice should far exceed this >figure, IF it can be kept in a micro-particulate form and >injected with perfect timing into a cylinder at the instant >of ignition of a lean gasoline (or other fossil fuel or >**especially** an H2 explosion). > >If even 5% by volume of ice-9 can be encapsulated in LN >(while bypassing the ice-2 formation stage); which then is >injected into a diesel at the high-end injection pressure >for a HEUI diesel (30,000 psi) >http://www.dieselpage.com/art1110ds.htm > >...one can theoretically raise the Carnot efficiency of the >fuel (excluding the cryo-component) to about 300% effective >Carnot, or fully 15 times above normal. In effect, this >should give one about 400 mpg equivalent mileage for a 200 >HP engine. But with that kind of efficiency - forget the >gasoline and go with on-board H2 !! and be totally >eco-friendly. > >Forget fuel cells. Forget hydrinos. Forget LENR. Lets >develop the hydrogen-fueled cryo-diesel... With this kind of >efficiency you can actually make your required H2 fuel >additive on-board, on-the-fly. Consequently on fill-up (at >home), one would take on only LN or CA (cryo-air) and water >only. Both the ice-9 and the H2 initiator would be >manufactured on-the-fly in the automobile. > >About 30% of you net horsepower would go to making the >necessary H2 via electrolysys, but the real power of the >engine would derive from the exploding ice-9 and the capture > of the 800:1 expansion ratio of the cryo-component. > >IOW with 200 HP available, you would devote 65 HP to onboard >electrolysis and 135 HP to powering the vehicle. Air >conditioning is a bonus. You can go full-blast AC with the >top-down, if you so desire, or even drive the Hummer to the >Sierra Club meeting with full impunity. Your only emmision >is cold air and water vapor. > >Now...did I get that right, Irving and Paul ? > >... or is it still too soon for this announcement, and will >you have to alert an agent, in order to send in the >trickster once again? > >Not to worry, hardly anyone with the necessary resources >listens to vortex anyway.... all sound and fury, signifying >nothing.... > >Jones
I didn't know that bit about Antimony expanding on solidifying. It all sounds very fascinating and not implausible. Is it possible to draw a Carnot cycle type diagram showing the variables that are involved? Frank Grimer
