The current issue, in addition tothe piece about
cold fusion, has some other interesting items.
A page is devoted to the comments of Michael
Shermer, editor of The Skeptic, who has this to say about "The Fossil Fallacy":
"We know evolution happens because innumerable bits of data from myriad fields
of science conjoin to paint a rich portrait of life's pilgramage." Nothing about
falsifiable theories, which is used to hack at "intelligent design". A
beautiful testament of faith, which with a few word substitutions, would be an
anthem in support of cold fusion.
In my view, it is demonstrable that natural
selection can drive adaptation, and in combinatorial chemistry, can drive the
discovery of new compounds, and works in many fields. But unless I am mistaken,
there has never been an experiment demonstrating the creation of a species by
natural selction. Various hypotheses are offered, but none rates the status of a
"theory".
The other item of interest is the cover story, in
which changes in received solar energy, tied to the interplay of the Earth's
precession and orbital motion, strongly correlate with the methane and CO2
content of the atmosphere over hundreds of thousands of years. Following that
cycle, we would now be in a strong cooling trend. However, the beginning of
agriculture some 5000 years ago has dumped methane from decaying crops and
reduced CO2 uptake by deforestation. The two combined have offset the reduction
in received solar intensity and kept the earth warm. But we may have overdone
it....
Mike Carrell
|
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Mike Carrell
- Re: Notes from Scientific American thomas malloy
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Jed Rothwell
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Jed Rothwell
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Terry Blanton
- Re: Notes from Scientific Americ... Jed Rothwell
- France and Belgium to study ... Haiko Lietz
- Re: France and Belgium t... Edmund Storms
- Re: Notes from Scientific American thomas malloy
- Re: Notes from Scientific American Jed Rothwell