It was 1858, Frank.
Blame the error on frosted-over glasses and old age.  :-)
I'm also pondering if dipping the electrodes of the electrolysis cells in
LN2
for a while might show ZPE-Pumping involved also.

Frederick

> [Original Message]
> From: Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/28/05 8:29:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?
>
> At 04:04 am 28-02-05 -0600, Sparber wrote:
> > BTW. Don't discount the Deuterium (as HDO &D2O) in the water and
> > as DCL in the HCL. 
> >
> > Even though it wasn't discovered yet.  :-)
> >
> > Frederick
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: Frederick Sparber 
> > To: vortex-l
> > Sent: 2/28/05 4:42:25 AM 
> > Subject: Re: Explosive Antimony on Platinum, Cold Fusion in 1855?
> >
> >
> > Frank Grimer wrote
> >
> >> At 01:21 pm 27-02-05 -0600, Sparber wrote:
> >
> >>> Is it possible that the Platinum-Antimony, Platinum-Hydride interface
> >>> set up conditions for Cold Fusion, that released 82 Kilojoule per 
> >>> gram of Explosive Antimony in Gore's 1855 experiments? 
>  
>
> >> That's quite a thought, Fred.
> >>
> >> History has often shown, with hindsight, that there were
> >> clear precursors to paradigm shifting discoveries which 
> >> at the time were just too mind blowing for people to 
> >> take in. 
> >>
> >> Frank Grimer
>
>
>
>
> > After going through about every possible exothermic 
> > chemical reaction that are orders of magnitude below 
> > what Gore reported, I would be surprised at any 
> > explanation other than CANR, Frank. 
> >
> > http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/Fluorine/exant.html
> >
> > http://www.lateralscience.co.uk/Fluorine/Sb.html
> >
> >
> > Gore (1855) found that if a current of electricity is 
> > passed through a solution of antimony trichloride
> > in hydrochloric acid---using an antimony anode, and a 
> > platinum cathode---an amorphous powder of specific gravity 
> > of 5.78 is deposited on the cathode. The cathode has 
> > the appearance of a smooth polished graphite rod. The 
> > deposit appears to be solid solution of antimony trichloride 
> > in metastable alpha-antimony.
> >
> > If this deposit be rubbed or scratched, an explosion occurs
> >
> > The explosion is attended by the allotropic transformation 
> > of then metastable or alpha-form of antimony into the stable 
> > beta-form or the rhombohedral variety, at the same time the 
> > temperature rises to about 250 degrees C, and 19,600 calories 
> > of heat are evolved per gram of antimony.
> >
> > Clouds of antimony trichloride are given off at the same time. 
> > Hence the term Explosive Antimony is given to a solid solution
> > (4 to 12 percent) of the trihalide in alpha-antimony."
> >
> > The heat of combustion of H2 + 1/2 O2 is 54,000 calories per 
> > mole (18 grams), or 3.000 calories per gram.
> >
> > The 19,600 calories per gram released by Explosive Antimony 
> > is over 6.5  times this.
> >
> > On initial application of current there should be a flash 
> > deposit of Hydrogen on the Platinum Cathode. After that, a 
> > mix of Antimony Chlorine and Hydrogen.
> >
> > The exotherm energies of Antimony Chloride or Oxide is less 
> > than 2.5 Kilojoule per gram.
> >
> > Way below the 82 Kilojoule per gram of Explosive Antimony that 
> > Gore reported in
> > 1855.
> >
>
>
>  Thoroughly fascinated by all the speculations I googled 
>  both the above URL's. I noticed that the date in the
>  first was:-
>  
>  "... prepared by G.Gore in 1858 ..."
>  
>  The second gives the same date.
>  
>  Now you've written 1855 both on your subject headers and
>  in the body of your post. 
>
>  I presume that is because your finger twitches with
>  excitement when it hits the numerical keyboard - Or is 
>  there some other reference which gives the date 1855.
>
>
>  Eighteen-fifty-five is twice as long ago as the date of the 
>  International Critical Data tables I used to mine the 
>  water/water vapour power laws from the spoil heap.
>
>  If the date is capable of becoming garbled in the meantime, 
>  then so are other factoids.
>
>  Are the 1855s correct? Or are they typos?
>
>  As the British Satirical magazine, "Private Eye" puts it, 
>
>  "I think we should be told."   ;-)
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Frank Grimer
>
>  
>



Reply via email to