At 04:02 pm 02-03-05 -0500, Jed wrote: >There is another document on this web site titled GPS.pdf. It is a report >on a visit to Innovative Energy Solutions Inc. I cannot tell who wrote it, >but it is someone who is easy to impress. If I had seen the same thing I >would have written a scathing report saying this trip was a waste of time >in the instrumentation is meaningless. It says: > > >"Report on Visit to IESI >December 17th, 2004 > >The purpose of the visit was meeting the group of entrepreneurs who >developed the new >energy source and see a live demonstration of the technology. . . . > >My understanding of the principle is that the Low Energy Nuclear Reaction >is produced by cavitation of deuterium enriched water in the presence of a >metal catalyst. In addition to cavitation, the reaction is accelerated >significantly by the use of a resonating frequency in the reaction cell.
I can understand your disgust with the poor standard of instrumentation, etc. Jed, but as far as I'm concerned, it all sounds terribly plausible. In my view, the people who think high pressure is needed are barking up a gum tree. I know this view has met with a catatonic silence from the readers of Vortex apart from Jones, and possibly Keith, but I am finding more and more evidence it is correct. I will be presenting some evidence from ice heave in soils, in a later post. Cavitation, resonant frequency and catalyst could all combine in delivering high pF. For the reasons I gave in my IE paper, that is at the basis, of CF (and also of Mills hydrinos, incidently). Mill's problem is, he has the atoms but not the bits, to use a Negropontean way of putting it. Incidently, I notice that Bush has appointed N's big brother as the new Intelligence chief. If he's as good as Nicholas, that's a good choice IMNSHO). Sorry if all this seems terribly arrogant, but it's not as arrogant as Mills ;-) I have also made substantial progress in understanding the significance of high order derivatives which has considerably increased my confidence that I am dead right on the action of Beta-atmosphere pressure and the lack of it. At least I've not had to convince anyone on Vortex on the number of 2s that come up when you spin a dice. 8^) -------------------------------------------------------------- "On the contrary. if I make 6N trials where N is a very large integer, even though the fraction of 2's could be 1/6, the probability of this is small and tends to zero as N tends to infinity ." (see post Re: Correa, 2 Mar 2005 03:52:49} -------------------------------------------------------------- Cheers Frank Grimer
