I wrote:
"Actually, I think it is plausible too. That is why I am disgusted
by the instrumentation, and also by the documents on this web
site."
What I mean is, if I thought these people were the usual perpetual motion
wackos, I would not care about the quality of their instrumentation or
web site. It is best for everyone when the perpetual motion crowd acts
the part. Sane people can instantly identify them and dismiss them. But
My Sources say that this group, at IESI, may actually have something
worthwhile, so it is a crying shame they dress up like wackos.
You can multiply that by a factor of ~100 for Mills. Presenting a
world-shaking radically new Theory of Everything on your web site is a
surefire way to alienate the public. That is true even if 50 years from
now everyone agrees you were a second Einstein and your theory was
correct. There is a place and a time for everything.
- Jed
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Jed Rothwell
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Hank Scudder
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Grimer
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Steven Krivit
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Robin van Spaandonk
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Steven Krivit
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Nick Palmer
- Re: Big CF breakthrough reported Edmund Storms
- Re: Big CF breakthrough repo... Jed Rothwell
- Re: Big CF breakthrough repo... Nick Palmer
- Re: Big CF breakthrough ... Jones Beene

