Excellent Fred, Couldn't have said it better myself ;-)
To confirm this thinking as accurate, I put in a call to Central Services last night. Unfortunately, neither Harry nor Dr. G were in at the moment (they have never been "in") but a call-back was promised by the switchboard operator "Ernestine," ... who sounded vaguely familiar and so oversexed that I had to ask for her number. She said, "don't worry, honey, any number will do, kind of like those theories you and Fred are tossing around." Damn... I was thinking, just what I need - another sneaky broad listening-in... and a mind-reader to boot, I'll never call her back. In the mean time, and back to being serious, or was that Sirius, Toto... arf... ...there is already some really well-developed ZPE/Dirac theory behind this idea of cryogenic mass-gain. Yesterday, I asked the real Wizard, the person who I consider above all others in doctoral level physics to be the expert on ZPE, Dirac's sea, the epo field, and related subjects, that being Donald Hotson, about this possibility. Unlike Puthoff, Sarfatti, Haisch, Rueda, etc Don can bring his thinking, and Dirac's mathematics, down to earth in understandable English. Actually Puthoff 'can' do this as well, but seldom does. Donald's writing style is so clear and logical, that one often scarcely realizes how deep into a precise understanding of complex math that he can take you. His Dirac articles are published in 'Infinite Energy' issues 43 and 44, available at : www.infinite-energy.com www.openseti.org. This broadening of Dirac by Hotson is the only causal, *direct-contact model* of the EM field with ZPE which is out there, at least in accessible non-mathematical form. I hope that DH will consider the possibility of Robert Forward's ideas about cryogenic mass-pumping in light of the epo field and get back to me with some details to share. Recently, he sent the most brilliant post that has ever appeared on HSG, and got not a single response. Not surprising on that forum, where everybody has such a specialized agenda, most of that agenda being to share some of their negativism about Mills' theory. Dr. Don has the ability to overwhelm with logic skeptics PhDs like Zimmerman, who are always looking for the "chink in the armor" but DH is more than their intellectual equal when it comes to his specialty. I will quote one paragraph from Donald Hotson's recent HSG post, which is showing up on other free-energy forums, and will ask his permission to include the whole post and other documentation from his IE article, in a later later vortex posting: "My proposed solution requires but a single, large assumption: that the Dirac equation means what it says, not what QED has misinterpreted it to say. Dirac's equation has four roots: it calls for electrons and positrons of positive energy, and electrons and positrons (or at least + and - charges) of negative energy. Adopting a kinetic definition of energy gives an unequivocal answer to the question 'what is negative energy?' In this definition, almost mandated by the Lorentz relationships, energy is the motion of charges; mass is a harmonic (standing wave) motion of charges." As an executive summary of how this could possibly fit in to Robert Forward's thinking about mass-gain at low temperature, one must realize that the epo field itself IS both real and close-by, and is itself a coherent BEC, and sits at a few degrees K in a hidden lattice all around us in another close dimension. When any normal matter gets close to this interface between our reality and Dirac's epo dominated sea, either by temperature or frequency resonance, then over time, that material will experience mass gain to the extent that there is "room" in that element in QM terms. This is why certain elements, like tin or antimony, or certain molecules like water, might work far better than others as they express an allotropic or polymorphic "gap" at low temperature, such that there is room for ZPE pumping. This is probably the mechaism behind superconductivity as well where the mass gain is to the Cooper pair adn seves as binding energy for the paring. More later, Jones > Recycled Energy : > The Papp engine: > Issue #51 of Infinite-Energy September/October 2003 Gene Mallove was Slain May 14, 2004. > http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue51/papp.html > > As far-fetched as this sounds, there might be something to it. > My recent delving into Zero Point Energy (ZPE) and the Casimir Effect > where space itself (from which our Universe was born) can at low, or temperatures > approaching absolute zero, alter the mass/energy of atoms/molecules such that > when they are suddenly brought to higher temperatures they "dump" energy > far in excess of that required to heat or cool them as their mass/energy re-adjusts. > > The so-called "3 K Radiation" from throughout space indicates that there > could be planet-sized objects WIMPS etc., at near absolute zero out there. > Also the1908 Tunguska event might have been a large "snowball" from space (or Hell?) that exploded > in that area as it released this stored-up energy as it came through the atmosphere. > > Frederick > > http://www.webelements.com/ > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A2524493 > > The Inversion Temperature: > " the 'normal' effect of cooling when a gas expands takes place below that temperature, above that temperature it heats under expansion." > Gas Inversion Temp Deg K > Space 0-3 > Helium 51 > Hydrogen 205 > Neon 242 > Nitrogen 621 > Argon 723 > Krypton 727 > Oxygen 893 > Xenon 1427 > > Zero Deg C = 272 Deg K > Zero Deg F = 255 Deg K
