Oops. Needless to say, long quick postings often produce
many errors:
To wit:
>The real difference from all other nuclei is that
> the effective distance between the two bosons, not to
> mention the low electric charge (cause and effect) -
which
> makes the D nucleus *loosely bound. * Heisenberg's door is
> open wide enough for weak and EM interactions to supply
the
> missing energy (recoverable) to induce a "stimulated" but
> "spontaneous" beta decay of the deuteron. And then
perhaps,
> because the neutron is so "deficient" itself - and
> accelerated decay of any stripped neutron which is not
> immediately absorbed.
>
> In a nutshell, that explains the issue of
non-detestability.
Well, this post may be detestable or not, but either way, it
should be stated more succinctly. BTW this last bit of humor
was a "reverse" spelling error, caused by my spell checker
not knowing that non-detectability is an intended word, if
not a real one.
But most importantly the point of a "stimulated" but
"spontaneous" beta decay of the deuteron is that it is two
distinct parts:
1) An energy "deficient neutron is first stripped
2) Within a very short time, one of two things must happen,
a) the stripped neutron is absorbed by another nucleus,
or
b) because of the QM energy deficit, it will undergo
immediate decay to p+n and the excess energy "returned"
Jones
