The claim made for the solar concentrator-Stirling array is that the
Stirling engine is more efficient than PV cells, which top out at about 25%,
with fairly elaborate construction. Presumeably the tracking systems can be
had for modest cost in large quantity. In previous studies of this
configuration the cost of individual trackers has been so high as to make
large scale deployment uneconomical. There have been other configurations,
like a boiler on a tower surrounded by a large array of tracking mirrors
focusing energy on the boiler. A lot of work has gone in afocal
concentrators to work with PV cells as well.

The energy is there. But note that the system is designed so that at night
the mirrors turn downward so the Stirling engines are near ground level for
maintenance. Converting the ouput of the thousands of individual generators
into phase-locked 60 Hz is an ambitious effort but well within the current
electrical engineering technology. Although I'm an EE, I'm not going to
speculalte on the best way to do this without a lot more information.

Jed is right, that it is not wise to concentrate the whole system in one
place for any number of reasons. The scale of the project in terms of
numbers and areas is big when you look at it in one piece, but is
essentially doable. Others have pointed out that if you could make the US
highway system into a PV solar collector, there would be plenty of power for
everyone. Or of you put it in the Arizona desert.

All the solar systems have to be cleaned, and a vulnerable wot weather and
damage from storms, in comparison with a hydroelectric dam.

As for storage, there are many systeems available. In some places, already
power plants pump water into an elevated resivoir in off peak periods, to
use to cover peaks. Flywheel storage is effective under certain conditions,
as well as advanced batteries, etc. It is not a question of if it can be
done, it can, but under what circumstances is it cost effective and will
people buy it, at what price? In the US we are not accustomed to
economizing, as are people elsewhere; there is a tendency to confuse the
ability to waste with wealth and power.

My wife and I live in a metropolitan suburban neighborhood. She is a
professional musician whose engagement are often distant and away from
public transportation. Personl, on-demand mobility is essential. One regular
engagement is 50 miles away.

Mike Carrell



Reply via email to