thomas malloy wrote:
Yawn, While a PM machine would be significant, I fail to see where it would produce much energy, enough to charge a battery perhaps, but rock the bedrock of physics, naw.
Oh come now! Surely you realize the laws of thermodynamics indicate that any kind of perpetual motion machine is impossible. This is one of the most fundamental tenets of physics. A perpetual motion machine would not merely "rock" physics, it would annihilate it.
Perhaps this is a joke, but in any case that same "yawn" reaction on the part of wannabe PM inventors -- the "no big deal" syndrome -- gets them into trouble with scientists. They do not even understand why their claims are so difficult to believe.
- Jed
