Now if simple loading **without any other power source** will increase the rate of decay, then the addition of the cavitation could possibly throw the system into a much more active regime.
Had Knuke been using a steel chamber, rather than plexiglass, the energy of the x-rays would possibly not have caused his symptons, as these x-rays are generally not the higher energy variety seen in actual fission, and would have been largely shielded by steel.
Knuke's experiment begs to be replicated in safe conditions, using a steel chamber with a port or thin window for monitoring radiation.
Thorium, which can be obtained legally in many forms, should work just as well since we are dealing with enhanced decay, and not fissile reactions. There are actually quite a few reoprts on this anomaly in the literature with electrolysis, but of course the fear is that it could be done irresponsibly.
----- Original Message ----- From: RC Macaulay
Ron,
The cavitation products made by Hydro dynamics Inc. apparently differ from the device used by Knuke. Dr. M.W Youds website has a vortex device that may be closer to what Knuke worked with. Youds speculated some " events' could occur that may be what happened to Knuke. We keep a gieger counter handy when testing water vortex research devices at rotational speed above 3450 RPM.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- From: Ron Wormus
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: Cavitation neutrons - was: Blast from the Past -
Well I can't answer either of your queries but heres a Co selling a commerical version of Knukes device.
http://www.hydrodynamics.com/index.htm
--On Monday, May 16, 2005 5:29 PM -0400 revtec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The silence is deafening. I have been waiting impatiently for Jones
or someone to respond to these posts by Knuke and speculate on how a
home brew cavitating turbine, spiked with mere traces of fissionable
material, can within five seconds of operation deliver a near lethal
dose of radiation! Dosn't this level of performance makes the Huffman
machine the Mother of all LENR devices? Someone more skilled than I
in the "art of duplicating" needs to check this out!
Is the silence on the subject due to the fact that every Vortex member with facilities is doing just that?
Jeff
P.S. I at least thought someone might imply that the account was
impossible and then back up their position with some "unasailable"
theorizing.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Huffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: Cavitation neutrons - was: Blast from the Past -
runsMoin Jeff.
The runaway events happened on the first model that I built. I did
thesein my kitchen less than a foot away from these radioactive tiles,had
but Ino clue that they were radioactive until later. While trying to getidea
a subsequent model to do the runaway thing again, I came up with the
crazyof lacing the water, thinking that it may have played a roll. Ion
used the geiger counter quite a bit while wiping down the tiles, but
didn't turn itfor the initial test run itself. I was in a hurry, and wanted toOne
see what would happen. Now I know.
This is all in the VG archives, if you want to download all of those
huge files and run text searches. At Bill Beaty's website there
used to be a photo of the first model, torn down, and sitting on my
kitchen counter.more word of warning though, if you go onto Bill Beaty's website,not
leave a trail of breadcrumbs or make bookmarks or something so that
you don't get lost. Whenever I visit Bill's website, I always get
lost for hours, ifyourdays. It's pretty weird in there.
Knuke
Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 23:26 schrieb revtec:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Huffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 2:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Cavitation neutrons - was: Blast from the Past -
>
> I reread your article in 1995 vol. 1 , no. 1of IE which > concluded
> with> impending success. What happened? Didn't your next model > work? Irecall> knowing about your kitchen sheathed in yellow cake tiles, but > can'trecall> if you told me that or if it was mentioned in a subsequent > articleI
> thatwas> am yet to rediscover. The implication was that the runaway > operationwalls.> possibly caused because the experiment was surrounded by > radioactive> I don't recall that you ever indicated that you used uranium > lacedto
> waterthat> fuel the turbine. Was it during the runaway describe in the > article> you suffered injury or was it during a later experiment? > > Jeff

