Geez Louise, the fellow's name is John Hutchison, without the "n" before the "s".
John is one of the great cool people in "weird science", but he's rapidly becoming the centroid of a mythos that has expanded beyond anything he ever intended - with each new "generation" of energy and Tesla-esque researchers finding their own beliefs and "answers" validated by something, somewhere that John supposedly has done. Anyone out there, though, actually still up for trying to duplicate the core Hutchison Effect, as it was studied and methodically evaluated back in the 1980s? Been there, tried it, as have a few others who put FAR more years and dollars (both US and Canadian) into it than I did. For the record, I never got anything like John's original core effect to work, myself, though I've never shelved hope entirely. But hey... what could be simpler for any of the high tension and RF junkmeisters out there to try their hand at? Cowboy up, sparkies, and set those hypotheses aside. solly so punchy today. nr --- Christopher Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas, > > The answer to future power is the plasma drive, and > if everyone would re-watch the Chernetski video, > everybody may get a better grasp at the importance > of the professors work. Does this sound familiar - a > small, compact power supply that taps the ZPF? A > small power supply is exactly what is required for a > small craft. > http://www.nuenergy.org/video/chernetski.rm > > There are many valid reasons why Hutchinson and I > are ignored by our governments and ISSO - but it is > useless to talk about any of them. > > ! > What IF, > within this 11 inch sphere - > ZPE could actually be tapped from the field. > Could it then not easily be manipulated for > propulsion and "other" uses? > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZpulsedQ5fignition > Regards, Chris > > > > thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a program at least strange by Thomas Malloy > Standards, John > Hutchinson http://www.hutchinsoneffect.com and the > physicist David > Sereda http://ufonasa.terra-ent.com/ were > interviewed on C to C on > Sundau morning. > > I had written a commentary on UFO's as part of the > Lamenting Space > thread which I don't believe was posted. Since I > don't like eating > crow, this was a good thing. Those of you who have > followed the UFO > literature will know that the objects in question > perform maneuvers, > which if a physical entity were aboard, the effects > of inertia, would > reduce him to jelly. That is unless inertia could be > turned off.. of > course. While Puthoff has written a paper > speculating about how this > feat might be accomplished, AFLIK, that's all it is, > speculation. To > listen to John and David, this as a demonstrable > fact. > > Then there is the propulsion matter. Puthoff has > also speculated > about this, but AFAIK, that's all it is. Again, John > and David were > talking about accomplishing just this, Something > about a large input > of energy, and then away you go. One can only wonder > what sort of > energy, and how much of it would be required to > accomplish this. > > Given the "gravity" of their claims, I can see why > the Pure Energy > People were so interested in John's work. > > It would seem to me that the people who run the > military > establishment would be all over this, but according > to David, John > can't get any funding from the government. Then > there is Joe Fermage > who has all sorts of money to promote his New Age > theology, and what > well meaning entities the Space Brothers are, but > doesn't have any to > help fund John's research. > > I do have a paradigm which explains why this is so, > but I don't want > to go there. > > > > > --------------------------------- > Discover Yahoo! > Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. > Check it out! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
