This'll make you smile, Jones. 8-) Wanting to find out more about Nicholas Moller I googled, clicked on "Cached", scrolled down to the highlighted *Nicholas Moller* and started reading.
This is good stuff I thought, where does it come from. I went to the top and found that it was in something called Mail Archive which had a picture of a filing cabinet. Looking across to the left I had to laugh. I found it was a post from our very own Vortex-L group - by Beene himself no less. I must admit I didn't really take it in at the time - but I do now. I'm interested to see that you have actually met this geyser, Jones. Now that I understand what is going on, I'm sure I could convince a potential investor. 8-) There were an awful lot of posts that day so for the benefit of those who missed it - or like me, didn't really take it in, I have appended it below Cheers Frank Grimer ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Re: More MAHG & BLP Jones Beene Fri, 27 May 2005 07:58:11 -0700 Mike, Hydrinophobes note: this may be a truly "independent" confirmation of BLP reactions. What would be the clincher is a window into the reaction chamber and spectroscopic analysis of the plasma there. Ironic that it may come from derivatily from Langmuir of 'pathological science' fame. You might want to write up the details of this experimental work and put your hydrino slant on it , for the benefit of the HSG forum. I have given up posting there as it has disintegrated into something-else, these days. Anyway, I have talked to Moller personally when he was trying to get his new machine and tubes out of Russia, where they were made - and he was running into trouble with Frolov. He is a tireless, extremely dedicated, thorough and doggedly determined fellow, and I think that he will succeed. He is a man-on-a-mission, and that type of personality generally gets there first when the more brilliant fast-starters stumble. I mentioned several possible ways to Moller that he can increase the heating of the 'Langmuir effect,' if it indeed has some relevance to a hydrino effect, as well. That is, if it is related somehow to the hydrino via a Mills catalysts (for instance, among other enhancers is adding argon, helium and/or slats of K or Sr). If he has taken that advice, he apparently either hasn't shared it with Naudin, or at least they have chosen not to publish that part of it yet. There is more than one operating MAHG unit, one must suspect, and I doubt Naudin is privy to the best-one. Should Moller go self-powered, and I think it will happen soon, it will likely end all chance for Mills getting the Nobel prize, as the base-effect was discovered elsewhere a half-century ago, and Mills OS theory has holes, whereas Dirac's does not, and so what has Mills contributed really? a name for a hypothetical particle that he cannot even weigh? The notoriety of the big-prize seems to have been RM's main concern and goal, rather than a commercial unit. The end-result of Moller getting there first would be triple-irony in my opinion (almost a biblical message about pride?). Here is the forecast and dramatized chronology of the quest for OU in the most abundant element, which would make a good TV docu-drama - how about "The Quest for Hy-O-U" Flashback: Langmuir invents the torch, finds the energy anomaly, but gets the Nobel for something else. Langmuir balks at his own finding, as it goes against physics doctrine, and even goes on to popularize the whole "pathological science" shtick - all along thinking that his torch could not possibly violate the sacrosanct 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, on which physics is built. Even though Dirac could have told him otherwise. However, Langmuir writes private letters to Bohr about the "anomaly." Years later, Mills finds something similar, in an energy anomaly involving hydrogen, but ignores Langmuir and Dirac and tries to foster his own pet theory onto the effect, which the critics tear to threads (in their own mind). In the mean time, Mills has neglected to produce the all-important self-powered unit, which will be absolutely necessary to get mainstream physics to believe in it. A determined fellow and admirer of the "Great Dane" (Bohr) comes along, named Nicholas Moller, finds the old letters from Langmuir to Bohr in Copenhagen, raises capital, draws up blueprints for something similar, has the device built in Russia, where the Russians try to steal the idea and patent it there. Moller has to hire a competing Russian mafia to get the machine out of Russia, but turns it into a self-powered unit, using the wealth of ideas available over the internet to improve the device, and by tracking-down the people who follow these things closely and will talk with him and people like Naudin who will do the testing. Moller, the pragmatist and tireless hunter, and not Mills the more brilliant but egotistical genius, "gets there first" and gets the ticket to Stockholm... and probably more wealth potential than Gates. That is, unless Mills (and/or many others who are in the running) somehow get a big breakthrough and get any self-powered unit in operation "real soon." Many are tantalizingly close. Many have been in hot pursuit longer than Moller. But lady-luck plays a few cards in this deal also. Actually I am hoping for a local player to step in at the last second with the self-powered unit, but it could also be Moller or Mills or Storms or Shoulders or Tessien instead. The 2nd Law will crumble soon. IMHO the big prize for breaking the law (2nd Law) and throwing physics into the disarray it rightly deserves for ingrained pig-headedness - will go for the device itself, and not the underlying theory, which may take a generation to flesh out. Let me repeat one thing - massive heat OU is NOT going to be enough - you must demonstrate a self-powered unit to remove all doubt. That device may not involved hydrogen, instead it may be even simpler than most experimenters in LENR can imagine. Time will tell. Everyone but a handful of Dirac believers sees that P.A.M. held the kernel of truth but no one wanted to believe that a long-neglected theorist living in Colorado (Hotson), and most disturbingly (for the mainstream) publishing that 'revised Dirac theory' in an iconoclastic "Infinite Energy," a totally ignored magazine by the mainstream - got the underlying theory right. So Hotson/Dirac will be intentionally disregarded for decades, and they will have to give the award for the device itself, not the correct theory. That is my (the eternal optimist's) take on how the story will unfold in the coming years (maybe months). I'm sure Randy et al. sees it differently. Al is always in there somewhere (methinks al is for 'alien'). BTW all vortex prophets and pundits are free to add your on spin on this upcoming docu-drama.. Jones
